Futura Medical Share Discussion Threads

[lbo] 28/10/2022 22:22

And there are also risks to just using a medical device placebo gels like MED. As far as can we know there is no long term and medium term safety use studies? Some MED impedance safety studies were just carried out in-vitro on cadavers!?








You are also forgoing all the other associated benefits of using oral PDE5I drugs like Viagra.



Patients taking the male impotence drug were found to have a lower risk of having a heart attack or dying from heart failure than those not on the medication.



Viagra could help men to live LONGER: Blue pill prolongs life and prevents heart attacks in males with coronary artery disease, study finds



Taking Viagra halves the risk of men who suffer from type 2 diabetes dying from heart problems



Taking Viagra could cut your risk of developing Alzheimer's by up to 69%



Viagra and other erectile dysfunction drugs may reduce risk of death from colon cancer by 20%

[lbo] 28/10/2022 22:18

Yes Med3000 is the placebo identical to Med2005 but with no GTN! ROFLMAO



PLO = Placebo (identical gel to MED2005 but without the active pharmaceutical ingredient glyceryl trinitrate)



After Phase III Failure, UK Firm Pushes Placebo to Treat Erectile Dysfunction



Expectations of having received the drug can be modulated if the subjective effects of a drug inform the individual that active medication has been administered and increase expectations of drug effects.

[lbo] 28/10/2022 14:17

So how did the placebo Med3000 gel cause placebo effects in FM57, FM71 and the HUT!? LOL



PLO = Placebo (identical gel to MED2005 but without the active pharmaceutical ingredient glyceryl trinitrate)



After Phase III Failure, UK Firm Pushes Placebo to Treat Erectile Dysfunction



Expectations of having received the drug can be modulated if the subjective effects of a drug inform the individual that active medication has been administered and increase expectations of drug effects.

[mikethebike4] 28/10/2022 14:05

Alcohol is different from Med

Med is used for a medical need

Alcohol is taken for relaxation/pleasure

There are no serious side-effects to Med

There are many with Viagra

You do not ingest Med - you missed that didn't you - keep your concentration up

[mikethebike4] 28/10/2022 14:01

Alcohol is different from Med

Med is used for a medical need

Alcohol is taken for relaxation/pleasure

There are no serious side-effects to Med

There are many with Viagra

You do not ingest Med - you missed that didn't you - keep your concentration up

[lbo] 28/10/2022 13:19

You get all those side effects from ingesting Alcohol too! And Alcohol is actually associated with more deaths per annum then oral PDE5i drugs have ever been since they were first launched. Yet you keep ingesting alcohol Mike!? And even placebos like Med3000 have side effects like headaches, nausea and penile burning



A Viagra study also showed using a placebo was also just as likely to harm you. It compared some 4,500 patients taking the drug to about 3,100 on placebo. So based on that study Med3000 even as a placebo is just as likely to harm you as viagra.



A new review of data from 250,726 trial participants has found that 1 in 20 people who took placebos in trials dropped out because of serious adverse events (side effects). Almost half of the participants reported less serious adverse events. The adverse events ranged from abdominal pain and anorexia to burning, chest pain, fatigue, and even death.

[lbo] 28/10/2022 12:18

https://www.urologytimes.com/view/what-do-you-tell-your-patients-about-all-the-new-erectile-dysfunction-treatments-being-advertised-to-the-public-“It’s all in the American Urological Association [AUA] guidelines.‘The therapies have not been validated’‘I recommend what we have as standard of care, which includes pills, injections, penile prosthesis, and vacuum devices that we know work. Other therapies have not been included in the standard of care yet’The first line therapy recommended in the General practice guidelines on ED is oral PDE5I drugs. Which would be based on all the available objective evidence. It would not be based solely on a rampers subjective and unqualified personal view. Or if a person just own shares in a company with a placebo gel alternative and who may have a vested interest and biased opinion.https://www.guidelinesinpractice.co.uk/mens-health/primary-care-is-well-placed-to-assess-ed/453513.articleFirst-line therapyFor most men with ongoing confirmed ED, first-line treatment will be a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5I).https://www.gponline.com/basics-erectile-dysfunction/article/1054447Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil) are recommended as first-line therapy. With established safety profiles, these drugs are well tolerated and effectiveGPC prescribing lead Dr Andrew Green:'There is no doubt that sildenafil is a safe and effective drug’

[lbo] 27/10/2022 21:22

The ramper is now trying to claim the FTC, the ASA, the SMSNA and the courts are all just making false judgments and rulings! Yet the anonymous ramper who is desperately ramping the shares is not! LOL



What standards are applied to evidence? The position taken by the ASA is a tried and tested one which has developed over the course of many years. It reflects the opinion of the wider scientific and academic community, rather than judgements made solely by the ASA. There are many aspects that are taken into consideration when evidence is reviewed and each claim is judged on its merits alongside the evidence presented to support it. Evidence submitted for health claims should normally include at least one adequately controlled experimental human



Remember, the anonymity of the Internet should make you skeptical of what anyone says if you dont t know who they are. Before making a buy or sell decision on a stock, make sure you are dealing with a reliable source. And if that source is an anonymous stock forum poster, that source is rarely reliable.

Here are 15 ways you can identify the stock discussion board ramper. I’ve seen the same behaviors in the stock rampers across many stock forums. Once you know the warning signs, you can learn to spot the ramper much more easily: They attack those who disagree with their lofty predictions. They cannot back up their arguments with a rational discussion, so they resort to petty name calling and telling others who disagree with them that they are ‘full of it’

[petroc] 27/10/2022 20:29

LiarBO is in full on panic mode today! 15 massive piles of stock bashing manure in one day, and the share price rises 4%! Bwahahahaha! Keep it up, you lying, stock bashing moron!

[petroc] 27/10/2022 17:59

LiarBO lying again. MED3000 has been proven to work in three trials. Just because LiarBO, a proven stock basher, says they aren't adequate, doesn't mean it's true. Those trials were 'adequate' enough to interest the EU regulators and the FDA and the scientific community. Sufficiently 'adequate' to interest both large and small investors. And, of course, 'adequate' enough to make LiarBO scuttle around like an idiot, frantically copy/pasting his stock bashing nonsense to keep his posts at the top of the pile to try and discourage ordinary, honest folk from making a few bob. I'd also like to know why he keeps trying to compare MED3000 with products that are already on the market. LiarBO, get this - MED3000 HASN'T BEEN RELEASED YET. IT'S NOT A 'PRODUCT' YET. IT CAN'T BE COMPARED WITH LONG STANDING TREATMENTS. IT CAN'T BE INCLUDED IN STANDARD OF CARE MEDICATIONS, BECAUSE IT'S NOT OUT YET! You stupid moron.