European Metals Share Discussion Threads

[ahbroad] 21/2/2017 18:13

Get over it bookworm!

[herschel k] 21/2/2017 16:39

I think we heard you the first ten times bookworm..........

[bookwormrobert] 21/2/2017 16:32

If Cinovec is good then Cinnwald is good. It's the same deposit - just cut in two by a national border. Cinnwald is only partially explored, but its probably about 1/2 the size of Cinovec (rather than the figures quoted on this bulletin board). Speaking for myself, I think EMH's board has really screwed this up.

[luisfrg] 21/2/2017 16:19

Madness that people are selling...so short sighted

[herschel k] 21/2/2017 16:18

surely then banshee, the question bookworm should be asking him/herself is.......is Cinnwald actually any good then?

H

[banshee] 21/2/2017 16:01

Any potential bidder could have had 50% of Cinnwald for a few million Euros though, a trifling sum. I imagine Cinnwald themselves would have preferred a serious player to BCN as partner, but it seems no-one else was that motivated.

[ahbroad] 21/2/2017 15:58

doesn't make a blind bit of difference. The resource is completely different in terms of size, and economics (not to mention programme).

I think EMH have done the right thing here, and this only goes to show the value in what they have (and are progressing rapidly)

[bookwormrobert] 21/2/2017 15:45

For myself, every which way I turn today's announcement about Cinnwald, it seems to me highly beneficial to BCN, and a bad mistake by the EMH board. They've lost the exclusivity of their appeal. Now every company proposing to take EMH over will bargain EMH's price down by threatening to put their money in BCN / Cinnwald instead. Not good.

[banshee] 21/2/2017 15:14

Certainly if it had been our Serbian friends RTZ or similar, it would be seen as both a high quality validation of EMH and an obvious precursor of a bid. We'd be up 50% by now, from BCN though, it merely muddies the waters.

[bookwormrobert] 21/2/2017 13:09

Hi Banshee! Care to speculate on your own question?

[banshee] 21/2/2017 13:00

More interesting to me than the question of why BCN did this, is why didn't someone else who is neither BCN or EMH do it?

[qackers] 21/2/2017 12:25

Not sure if this interview has been posted.

hxxp://www.directorstalk.net/qa-keith-coughlan-managing-director-european-metals-holdings-ltd-lonemh-3/

[herschel k] 21/2/2017 11:38

myst,

didn't you realise that Bacanora are soon going to raise money to build the world's biggest straw so they can suck the tin, lithium and other minerals from Cinovec via Zinnwald, right under EMH's noses?

:)

H

[myst1] 21/2/2017 11:37

robert

what about the block EMH obtained from Solarworld last year....virtually for nothing.

Also if you have an approx 10mt mine which is more than enough, why bother adding another 2mt at solar world?

[bookwormrobert] 21/2/2017 11:20

Somebody needs to say it, so I will. EMH's board have missed a trick here - they should have completed the tie-up with Solar World / Zinnwald, and not let Bacanora get in. Over time this will prove a very expensive error.

[wrtmf] 21/2/2017 09:30

i would recommend folks try to get hold of the solarworld presentation from march 2015. the lithium greisen appears at surface on their side, but the tin ore slants deeper towards the north. [no mention at all in bcn rns that emh is its southern neighbour].

[bookwormrobert] 21/2/2017 09:17

I'd give a lot to know what's going on with REM's (Rare Earth Metals) relationships with both BCN and EMH. You can't argue with the wisdom of their original investments - their third project, Yangibana in Australia is also an excellent choice. But how do they intend to play it from here? They have substantial stakes, but no control, in both BCN and EMH. Surely they won't be content to remain as passive stock holders?!?

[herschel k] 21/2/2017 09:03

Bookworm,It will take them at least a year to get close to where EMH are with Cinovec, imo.H

[wrtmf] 21/2/2017 08:58

i don't get it. kiran could have stayed. if i've read rns right, bcn have taken the 1/3 of cinovec sitting on the german side of the border. kiran could have overseen the unification of zinnwald/cinovec project and bcn/emh become partners further closely connected than they are already through rem.

zinnwald/cinovec both mean something like 'place of tin'

i see a future tie up - bringing sonora and zinn/cin under one roof could create a new major producer.

[ps. the li/sn/w mineralisation should tell you its the same structure]

[cpap man] 21/2/2017 08:48

John201720 Feb '17 - 22:24 - 1276 of 1288 5 0

Mugabe took over the foreign diamond mines recently so what stops him taking over the Lithium deposits or the mining operations of prem?



MUGABE or as they say in Yorkshire EBAGUM will be dead soon but then what for ZIM?!?!?



The likes of EMH, BCN and even KOD are IMHO at this point in time much safer LITHIUM bets!

[bookwormrobert] 21/2/2017 08:19

Long write up for he Bacanora (BCN) deal in this morning's Telegraph. It's the possible reopening of an old East German tin / lithium mine called Zinnwald - so it could be up and running fairly quickly. No wonder why Kiran left the BCN board!

[steeplejack] 21/2/2017 07:57

With its European plans,BCN appears to have endorsed EMH as being in the right place at the right time.

[cyfalafwr] 21/2/2017 07:15

Competition for EMH?
Is this why Kiran left the BCN board?