Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Elektron Plc LSE:EKT London Ordinary Share GB00B0C5RG72 ORD 5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 7.375p 7.25p 7.50p 7.375p 7.375p 7.375p 0.00 07:55:14
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Electronic & Electrical Equipment 43.3 0.8 0.4 18.4 13.72

Elektron Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1751 to 1773 of 1775 messages
Chat Pages: 71  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  63  62  61  60  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/2/2017
19:39
I heard today that Keith has had enough of all the negativity hereWell,he has two clear choices 1/ resign as chairman 2/ stop reading this threadV simple!!
patviera
23/2/2017
17:13
Not a clue Simon.
blackss
23/2/2017
15:15
If you google check it and Ikea you get loads of links saying "check it out at Ikea" :)
blackss
23/2/2017
14:44
Beeks He can't. He's utterly deluded. Presumably the bankruptcy trustee is trying to find a buyer for his shares.
eg2mrb
23/2/2017
14:12
Thanks Simon. I still fail to understand how you can force through what you have said without the majority shareholder approval? Even if you say "the shareholder base is corrupt", surely there is still due process in the companies act for this?
beeks of arabia
23/2/2017
13:56
Beeks eg hasn't a clue, I still live in the same house, I still drive the same car, my shares are still in my own name. The transcript of the recent court case will explain why I have lost court cases the court been misled. Its also untrue I have lost every court hearing, I won a court hearing in Liverpool before DJ Green. As for shareholder votes they are irrelevant shareholders have gained votes illegally, the shareholder base been corrupted and the evidence been placed before the courts.
simon templar qc
23/2/2017
12:59
Simon, if you hold <2% of shares, wouldn't you need the support of another 49% or more to get this through?
beeks of arabia
23/2/2017
12:41
Precisely. That is why I wanted the court to temporarily place the company in their hands while a new non executive chairman is appointed to reconstruct the board. That is one of the things I requested before I took out contempt of court action, I already had an offer of a immediate replacement for Daley should he have been summarily dismissed.
simon templar qc
23/2/2017
12:24
Simon How independent can the non execs be if they represent only 2 shareholders??
patviera
23/2/2017
12:16
yoyo All the directors are lost. The non executives are not legally non executives, as they were put on board by two of the highest holders and the finance director ignored the evidence of criminal conduct before the derivate action hearing. By the way, what was that about Ikea? Did they have a pilot?
simon templar qc
23/2/2017
12:05
KD he lost the plot a long time ago
dishthedirt
23/2/2017
11:14
who else has been lost?
yoyoy
23/2/2017
10:44
Dont buy a stack of shelves from them then...they could be off !
blackss
23/2/2017
10:33
Checkit lost IKEA too
dishthedirt
23/2/2017
10:32
Checkit have lost IKEA too
dishthedirt
22/2/2017
21:46
We had only two institutional investors who both sold out as they didn't rate DaleyIn fact one of them sold out and then bought into versarien as they liked Ricketts not Daley So if daley hadn't have sacked Ricketts we would have a much better rating as we would've had institutional backing Now neither institutions not private investors will invest here As another holder Downing told me.....ekt is an absolute shamblesAs we can all see it's even worse now with 5m qd down in the drain on checkit Daley please leave
patviera
22/2/2017
21:41
SimonHaven't the directors a duty to inform the market?Have u contacted the nomad and broker finncap?Sounds like they are withholding price sensitive informantiom which is also a criminal offence isn't it?
patviera
22/2/2017
21:37
SupergLoser is a massive understatement 1000s of PI here have the same opinion
patviera
22/2/2017
21:35
Because I couldn't write it all down, my recollection the transcript I am seeking is the Judgement albeit a summing up following over 3 hours of outlining my case, a summing up and determination in relation of various submissions and evidence and final ruling on a contempt of court. I know that may sound a bit strange however it was made clear to me that the Vice Chancellor accepted the previous court had been misled over a considerable number of issues, hence my ability to continue a number of actions, including a further contempt of court action. What I can say is the first Judge who ever looked at my case in 2013/14 did determine my case had merit. What should have happened is my case been referred to the CPS not long after due to evidence of criminal conduct. The reason it didn't was entirely due to the defendants lawyers/barristers conduct. I cannot say any more until I receive the transcript albeit the court been misled throughout the previous proceedings up to the court of appeal and thereafter hence my previous contempt of court action against the directors of Elektron and also various lawyers both acting for the company the defendants and indeed my own lawyers and barristers. When this matter went to the court of appeal my own direct access barrister acted wrongly. Its turned out a very complex matter which is able to be rectified in due course. I don't know whether you managed to download the transcript at the court of appeal, but when I obtained the same I was shocked at the conduct of my own barrister. He failed to draw important issues to the court of appeal, and that is why I took contempt of court action against my own barrister. The transcript of the Judgement should cover some of these issues.
simon templar qc
22/2/2017
20:47
Simon, is the transcript you are seeking what the judge said at the end of the hearing - the summing up, or is it a transcript of his judgement or ruling?
yoyoy
22/2/2017
19:54
What I am saying is I provided the RH Vice Chancellor with considerable evidence which cannot be defended. Daley has breached his service contract and there is evidence which allows the board to summarily dismiss him without pay, and claim compensation for all the damage he has caused, if the board fail to do so they could be held responsible as well. He can be removed under the director disqualification act failing a board removal.
simon templar qc
22/2/2017
19:13
Simon You say that Daley will be out of a job within weeks?Is this still the case as he's being paid 25k a month by Ekt whilst adding nothing
patviera
22/2/2017
18:54
Blacky You are correct I apologise.
simon templar qc
Chat Pages: 71  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  63  62  61  60  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:40 V: D:20170224 10:26:07