Eicom Share Discussion Threads

[temporary] 20/3/2008 19:38

What are you talking about?

Seriously, go and get some help for your problems.

[temporary] 20/3/2008 13:05

So you claim Legal Aid

And yet you can provide no proof.

You clearly have "small man" syndrome and feel impotent because all you can do is come on to these boards and make up stories.

I actually feel quite sorry for you.

[legal aid] 20/3/2008 11:30

Must be due another drop soon.

The company is seriously over valued considering the level of honesty displayed by the directors and also the extent of funds which get stolen.

[substantial wealth] 17/3/2008 13:27

5 EIC Eicom 3.25 18.18 0.50

[legal aid] 17/3/2008 11:06

(And I notice that you said something very similar about "YOO")

In reality EIC is down again - which only shows that the MM's still believe that Timmid and Fooler are yet again overvalued, even if only now at o.054% of the starting point.

You would struggle to imagine how on earth it could be possible to ruin a company so severely. (unless of course you were persistently stealing everything available)

[hutchison2] 16/3/2008 08:14

wonder if the j boys are planning a qxl type rise?

[relishing] 15/3/2008 15:41

A 50% fall is one thing. This is something else!


free stock charts from www.advfn.com

Shares now worth 0.054% of their original value (-99.946%), a quite remarkable achievement!

[temporary] 15/3/2008 15:20

Hi ucretin

I have tried to find this so called proof and I cannot. I have seen lots of accusations but no proof.

I was under the impression that in this country you were innocent until PROVEN guilty, not innocent until someone claims you are guilty on a bulletin board.

Please provide the links to this proof.

And yes, as mentioned before I did invest at 3.5p (now 350p). Thanksfully only a small amount. I also bought shares of Dixons that have dropped over 50% - I suppose the board of that company are also "liars and crooks"?

At least some of my other shares have been better performers!

[temporary] 13/3/2008 16:45

It wouldn't even surprise me if the company underwent another main name change - afterall this one has performed every bit as badly as the last one, and with their reputation for dishonesty - they have to keep switching to avoid facing the guilt.

What I would call dishonest is posting allegations on a bulletin board with no proof.

Now who do we know who does that?

Oh, Hello Legal Aid

Show us the proof (and don't forget to ask if I want fries with that)

[legal aid] 13/3/2008 16:04

Perhaps one last gasp for air before finally snuffing it.

[bsg] 13/3/2008 14:41

Not sure about your fall, seems to of gone up again ! Can't buy many online.
Must be a con ? hope I'm not still saying that when it gets to 10p !

[bungeetrader] 12/3/2008 08:46

hutchison2, if you think that is an impressive website then you need to get out more. What a pile of rubbish.

[bsg] 12/3/2008 08:27

Yep, can see it now, in the accounts, new web site £516,345.56.

[jbat] 12/3/2008 08:16

Oooh, a new website - another embezzling exercise!

[hutchison2] 11/3/2008 17:50

been told by an insider in the city that this could be the next 50 bagger...check out their updated website ...impressive

[william-just] 11/3/2008 17:44

This must be the great 1k rip off club.
I also have or had £1000.00 in this.
But you have to laugh.

[iperera] 11/3/2008 16:41

dear Dear me. from my first buy at 3.5p (350p) I have lost 99.42% of my value.

The return on investing 1,000 quid. capital + dividend 5.71


Good Work Steve.

[temporary] 10/3/2008 10:21

Hi Stuart

You need to be aware that Legal Aid is a troll. He posts loads of accusations on these boards and yet has no proof.

I would just ignore him. People like him cannot be reasoned with. You only need to look at his previous posts to see the level of intellect you are dealing with.