We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cscape | LSE:CSC | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4LFNL36 | ORD 10P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 7.50 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 7.50 | GBX |
Cscape (CSC) Share Charts1 Year Cscape Chart |
|
1 Month Cscape Chart |
Intraday Cscape Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/3/2012 | 21:54 | Cscape: 900k MARKET CAP, IN PROFIT, DIRECTOR BUYING, NEW ORDERS, Ј2.5M TAX LOSS | 1,530 |
| 18/4/2011 | 19:50 | NEB to CSC | 2,629 |
| 07/10/2009 | 14:34 | CScape - Digital Services - The Road to Recovery ? | 199 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 09/3/2012 13:44 by 25wbh Had a letter from Gallaghers today with the details of the cScape group in administationOutcome bluesky sold to KY for £220,260.45p cash. Low price because it had run out of funds and quick sale to Keith to stop it going bust ??? Well you would just wonder just how long the company has been solvent. |
Posted at 14/1/2012 13:54 by vaneric A reminder of the predictions made on 8th March last year on here for where the price would be on 1st April 2011. :-)Just found in my scribblings. Max £3.25 25WBH £3.75 Tara £10.00 Van £1.40 Well we all got that wrong didn't we. V. |
Posted at 16/11/2011 08:58 by 25wbh It is total manipulation Max, and i agree m,the share price would go up as news flowed. They seem to loose money like a sieve and killicks 175k Salary doesnt sit well with the losses |
Posted at 15/11/2011 17:58 by pwhite73 So sorry to read today's announcement and my sympathies go out to 25wbh and maxbubble.Few listed companies have been strangled so slowly and mercilessly as netb2b2/CSC. The thing is it had so much promise, it was born of the internet age. This is what can happen when one man's ego and money gets in the way of business innovation. This made me chuckle:- "Following the Cancellation, the Board intends to set up a matched bargain arrangement to enable Shareholders to trade the Ordinary Shares". So scant was any news from the company that the shares were being traded on a matched bargain arrangement anyway. The board will get their required 75% as people head for the exit tomorrow. My advice would be not to sell no matter what. The company is only capitalised at £1 million and does tremendous high quality work for Microsoft and a host of other high brand name companies. For all you know an offer may be on the table but it will only materialise when the company has gone private. Sit tight. |
Posted at 19/10/2011 16:24 by 25wbh Agree with u V but not only am i an optimist but a gambler.A guy that puts 2 million plus shares in his Pension fund at rock bottom prices at some time will need to come up for air and then the rest of us can see what his intentions are. The following announcement has been issued to correct an announcement made by the Company on 13 August 2009 (RNS: 3812X) which stated the price of the transfer by Keith Young to his SIPP to be 3.375p per share. The correct price is 3.3p per share. The full text of the announcement with the correct price and the actual date of the transfer is set out below: cScape has been notified that, on 12 August 2009, Keith Young, a director of the Company, transferred 2,000,000 ordinary shares of 10p each to his Self Invested Personal Pension ("SIPP") at a price of 3.3p each. They could not get that right first time either!!! What a company, V&Max, |
Posted at 14/10/2011 13:49 by 25wbh Welcome to this boring thread andrbea, cScape dirt cheap but Keith the Chairman likes to keep it all under wraps,The more u look into the background of this share and the customers it has the more u will get the feeling that they dont want the share price to move up.I take it u have now a holding?U could be right max, 5000 goes through on the plus marker at 64p and the bid doesn't move,50,000 before the consolidation would have produced a rise of 20p or more. Anyhow andrbea,welcome to the club,B |
Posted at 14/10/2011 12:41 by andrbea a big cliff to climb for csc (from 66p to 180p)but blue today, on a good run this week 12/10/2011 08:15:25 CSC 62.50 O 2,500 12/10/2011 08:14:58 CSC 61.00 O 2,500 |
Posted at 20/7/2011 10:52 by 25wbh Does this apply to cScape or its American sister??Broker comments in the UK today. Compiled by Dow Jones Newswires Markets Desk, markets.eu@dowjones. 0747 GMT [Dow Jones] Jefferies starts coverage of REITs covering 79% of the UK public real estate and France's Unibail-Rodamco (UL.FR). Rates the following as buys: British Land (BLND.LN), Land Securities (LAND.LN) and Workspace Group (WKP.LN). The following are holds: CSC (CSC.LN), Derwent London (DLN.LN), Great Portland Estates (GPOR.LN), Hammerson (HMSO.LN), Hansteen (HSTN.LN), Metric (METP.LN), SEGRO (SGRO.LN), Shaftesbury (SHB.LN) and Unibail. Notes REITs are trading on average at a 5% premium to net asset value. Cautions that "if the weight of capital driving property values is interrupted, then optimistic share prices risk looking exposed, lacking adequate dividend yield support, and with no real growth prospects." (toby.anderson@dowjo |
Posted at 26/5/2011 13:19 by 25wbh Just about 1 Month to end of financial period end, have they made a profit or are overheads still a problem, and what really was the reason for the consolidation ?.In my view just to entitle Kieth to get his hands on the majority of the company. How cynical is that .lol.No mention of corporate action Taken from the Company circular sent to shareholders 1/12/10 In addition, the Board believes that the Company's ability to attract new, particularly institutional, investors would be enhanced and so the liquidity of the Company's shares improved if, following a sub-division and redesignation of the Ordinary Shares, there was a consolidation of the shares then comprised in the Company's ordinary share capital into shares of a higher nominal amount. And a few words of future prospects would have made the share price rise ,instead we got this Capital Reorganisation The Company's ordinary shares of 10p each ("Ordinary Shares") are currently trading at or below the nominal value. It is unlawful for the Company to allot Ordinary Shares at a discount to their nominal value and this, therefore, restricts the Company's ability to issue new Ordinary Shares, either for cash or non-cash consideration, at or near to the current market price of an Ordinary Share. Therefore, in order to undertake an equity fundraising or take advantage of any future opportunities, the Board proposes a sub-division and redesignation of the Ordinary Shares. We do need as shareholders some measure of progress issued by RSN before the normal date of Christmas Eve Does anyone else agree?? |
Posted at 24/3/2011 16:53 by 25wbh Max, If i had to remember to go and post on twitter twice a day when i was working , my contribution to company profits would have been seriously reduced.Not just the time but the lack of concentration. Keith must be well happy with with Rob over the years as he has managed to achieve a loss throughout the last 10 years and still had share options and pay rises. The write downs are very considerable over the years and should return as assets under any other management Who's the fool Max. Rob, Keith, Aim stock market allowing the monopolization of the shares by Keith, or u and i.Think that they must both be laughing all the way to the bank.What do their competitors in the profession think Max??? Lets just see what this latest set of results suggests ,EH And PS . 1.Why is a company like this fighting against a falling share price over so many years when others without the same background and expertise flourish 2 Why is it that (sorry about this Tara),some on a bulletin board can see value in the company and the share price increases , (Not out of hyping as P suggests ) but has a following of people who respect HIS/HER judgement. Pity the Directors and the marketing staff did not wake up to do their jobs sooner to the shareholders of ten years plus.This is our company as well as yours and in many cases as i see it we own some of it and you only work there Now we have to put up with news though the web page and twitter. nothing works better than a good RNS The Chairman takes the blame at every result announcement so i blame him with messing around with our money as well as his own. Hes lost his own but he should not take the view that our money is to be lost. He may be worth 100s of millions but he wants to wake up to the feelings of ordinary people( excluding u Max) that have lost thousands As Max said yesterday , WE ALL NOW EXPECT KEITH PPS and if you dont sell out, i think we need a change at the top( the Times will hire your Mate),lol |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
