We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concha | LSE:CHA | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8Y82097 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.175 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/3/2017 07:35 | BP our problem now is the ability of CHA to fund its involvement with Ve and the only way I can see is a fund raise at these levels. Yes if you look back in history CHA in all its disguises has been a dud for anyone who has tried to make something of the company | solarno lopez | |
13/3/2017 23:02 | The bod here has a enviable record of investment in complete duds. All those millions they could have invested in so many projects. Just as the miners were able to soar. Or house builders. Or with some Wall Street stocks up 1000 per cent and tech stocks soaring....just about anything. Instead they put it in this. Worth .1 as a shell with an almost worthless investment. | barnetpeter | |
13/3/2017 09:59 | In an odd way, the recent woes of VE may lend themselves to a potential LSE listed, over to you CA and make it happen!,.....GL S | swizz | |
13/3/2017 08:38 | Ooof bit of a rollercoaster this one. | jjcamargo | |
12/3/2017 21:52 | Apart from all this bad news VE still looks to be a viable company if they raise the additional funding with an experienced team behind them. Wonder if Concha will be investing more to average down. | the shuffle man | |
12/3/2017 21:50 | TW on to this onehttp://www.sharep | the shuffle man | |
12/3/2017 19:39 | Not good ! | the shuffle man | |
08/3/2017 10:09 | I think the party is over here, guys. Time to move on | shareho1der | |
06/3/2017 09:39 | I see the recent movement in VE as positive. At least more positive than it was looking before. Let's see what Stuart Chambers can do. I also suspect it was akers and Co who got chambers in. Brown leaving was probably all planned. No doubt he has shares and has made his pennies. Interesting time ahead I think. | codeine1 | |
06/3/2017 09:24 | chris akers @sportschris 20h20 hours ago More @Ant1986 I supported the shareholder group that pushed David Brown out;expect Ve to now be run properly & achieve profitability much sooner! From LSE with their thanks | solarno lopez | |
06/3/2017 09:10 | Thanks for your thoughts guys | solarno lopez | |
06/3/2017 09:05 | FWIW I think its a good move that Brown has gone and it was probably a condition of the mooted fund raising. The company going forward will be on a much better financial footing which should hopefully see it move into profitability later this year, guided by some proper, experienced VC entrepreneurs that will hopefully justify the current valuation. | the shuffle man | |
06/3/2017 08:51 | akers himself has said he supported, with his cha hat on i presume, the shareholders ousting brown. think we will see some VC money appearing for VE now. | jjcamargo | |
06/3/2017 08:48 | One poster is saying it was Akers who had Brown removed | solarno lopez | |
06/3/2017 08:44 | FYI just googled and LSE postings seem to be validated by FT:https://ftalphavi | dusseldorf | |
06/3/2017 08:25 | Thanks for the up date Dussy and do not blame you for moving Looks like AKERS is a one hit wonder when you consider Cha and Yolo | solarno lopez | |
06/3/2017 08:23 | I'll put my hands up to selling end of last week. Nothing to do with any LSE posting but simply that Akers appears not to be interested - The red leopard activity i guess the final straw as clearlty he plans to reverse something into that. 20% hit but i'm sticking to stocks with a business with turnover and management with vested interest in making it work. If interested I move the CHA capital into LCG.Good luck here, sods law says it will go through the roof now, but I'd rather not leave it to pure chance. | dusseldorf | |
28/2/2017 22:55 | Jj. Yes noticed the RLH activity today. CA certainly occupied with other tasks now. Maybe time to leave us. | codeine1 | |
28/2/2017 10:45 | akers has just pumped £250k into RLH | jjcamargo | |
23/2/2017 14:42 | ve with 474m shares would now be ready for a float. i think cha will not own any part of ve upon float | jjcamargo | |
23/2/2017 08:41 | Thanks Dussy | solarno lopez | |
23/2/2017 08:39 | Excellent research Duss. I was aware of the share split but not the ratio. Chambers appointment leads me to believe he is there for something big. Also the secondary market talk may have a play in this. | codeine1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions