Amd Commo Exagr Discussion Threads

[loverat] 11/5/2010 19:02

Yeah - 11.15am start - must have finished 12:45pm.

Basically, I think the AC judges did not want to discuss the merits or otherwise at all. It was all to do with case management.

One of them did quip at the beginning (after discussing Justice Eady being sued)that by the time they had delivered the judgement they might be sued also.

I do not think they were very impressed regarding one of their members being sued.

[debaleb] 11/5/2010 18:56

I thought it was scheduled to last all day, late start then all over by lunch!

[loverat] 11/5/2010 18:52

debaleb

His brief did not seem that bad but I think I heard that he was acting 'pro bono' (the brief)

The judges gave him a very hard time - I suppose perhaps they were also wondering whether this is the stuff to be resolved in the HC.

I do not believe any costs were awarded.

I am sure others might fill in any gaps - the case finished at 12.30pm or so and I spent another 3 hours in the pub afterwards.

However, it was an encouraging judgement - I think most agreed it was..

[debaleb] 11/5/2010 18:37

Thanks Loverat, seems strange that it's going back to Eady again but we all know what he thought last time.

Was his brief any good?

Any costs awarded?

[loverat] 11/5/2010 18:32

My distinct impression is that he is nearly finished.

But in the meantime, I think posters should be as restrained as my goodself. Verify your views as fact or opinion based on fact. Otherwise best not post.

[loverat] 11/5/2010 18:15

Today I visited the High Court.

Smith has had his appeal dismissed.

However, the matter has been referred back to Eady J and my understanding is this:

- That the claimant has to clarify precisely which of the 20 odd cases he intends taking forward. There is some confusion in this respect.

- That the claimant justify to the court that the existing claims have merit and should not be subject to a stay.

- That the claimant should justify why he should not be subject to a CRO.

A very encouraging judgement and one in which all the appeal judges gave his brief an extremely rough ride. All in my humble opinion of course.

On another note, it seemed to me that the Woody Allen lookalike in court might be consigned to the libel dustbin. He looks like a liability.

As the Appeal Court Judge said..........have fun.

[loverat] 08/5/2010 19:32

Blitz St on the box at the mo.........

Time for a spot of Churchill.

[loverat] 08/5/2010 16:42

Ignore the parasites on this site.

Embrace the good causes. Rwanda is a great country and a great cause. The libel reform site is also O.K.

[loverat] 08/5/2010 16:24

Hey guys - I attended a beautiful funeral very recently.

If I cop it, I want posters on here to play this one.

[loverat] 08/5/2010 16:19

Please post your requests.

[loverat] 08/5/2010 16:06

How can anyone fail to be moved by this?

[loverat] 08/5/2010 15:57

A million voices.......

[man overbored] 07/5/2010 18:46

A premier #, nota bene.

I can see a likeness, Ratty.

I understand Keith Negal may have expertise in such matters.

[loverat] 07/5/2010 18:28

Looks like some folk are getting very desperate!!!!!!!

[loverat] 05/5/2010 06:23

And where did this poster appear from, then disappear just as quickly?

Perhaps, if he is reading he could give us the benefit of his insight.


LETSGOTOWORK - 20 Oct'08 - 15:50 - 8782 of 8916

nickcduk, I agree, Allnutt has been involved but to want extent was he involved in the overall decision making as a non exec ?? Don't get me wrong, I'm not singing Allnutts praises here. However, we need to remember that Littlewood didn't get the backing he wanted by investors / the city, threw his toys out of his pram and resigned. As far as I'm concerened the buck stopped at the top, and that was Littlewood. All I'm saying is(without wishing to repeat myself)is that Allnutt has remained on board (no pun intended), has issued a statement saying he wants to get to the botttom of the companies activities under Littlewood, has appointed a new CEO to do just that. In my opinion, Negal needs to be given time to try and sort out this company, discover whats happend and come up with a plan to get us out. Let's watch this space..........

LETSGOTOWORK - 21 Oct'08 - 10:25 - 8785 of 8916

Morning, thanks for the post Irene. I honestly don't know the answers to your questions, however, I got straight through to George Allnutt yesterday and he was happy to answer my questions where he could. I would suggest you give him a call ?? In my opinion, he can't release a statement, and probably doesn't wish to, until he has some solid facts to hand. It should also be down to the CEO to release such a statement. However, I would rather Negal concentrate on his "exploratory" work.

Tennis, I agree with your comments, why was Allnutt removed from the board ??
Was Allnutt not playing ball ?? Would he not fall into line ??
Doesn't sound like a "bosom buddy" of Littlewoods to me ??

Regards

[loverat] 05/5/2010 05:56

Fact is, reading back through this thread I cannot see anything here which is incorrect, never mind deliberately misleading or false as some might have you believe.

It has been a bastion of free speech and thanks to the research of several individuals and shareholders, has led to the exposure of deceptive and misleading behaviour by some of those who were on the board of directors of LDC/COMG and others. There is alot more which regretably cannot presently be published here.

It is not just the fact that these individuals have misled others. It is the fact that these people were in positions of power and trust for many years. They preached others as to how to behave but behaved the opposite. That is what most people find most galling.

They will not come on here and justify their actions though - because they know they would be defending the indefensible.

[debaleb] 05/5/2010 00:14

"he's probably psychotic"

His words. :-)

Here Anon, take this gun and shoot yourself in the foot again.

[debaleb] 05/5/2010 00:11

mots - 4 May'10 - 10:26 - 1099 of 1100


I know for a fact that the poster Anomolous has used at least 50 aliases on advfn.

On 27th February 2008 I obtained an Order for Disclosure from Master Fontaine at the High Court forcing him to disclose this information directly to me - and he did.

"Who would trust a poster that has multiple identities?"

Indeed!

[debaleb] 05/5/2010 00:10

Anomalous - 29 Mar'05 - 16:41 - 4109 of 10112


Besides, who would trust a poster that has multiple identities. Agincourt has numerous ADVFN pseudonyms. You have to question someone that uses more than one ID, to reflect his personality, because he's probably psychotic. He certainly
exhibits a severe personality disorder and distorted sense of reality.
A pity that they have care in the community, as otherwise he would have been sectioned years ago.

[debaleb] 04/5/2010 19:38

LOLS!

Quality.

Saved, pot kettle, pot kettle................. :-)

Unemployed liar/defamer, what reputation, hahahahahaha.

The time is nigh sweaty lad, mine and check that train timetable. :-)