Cic Gold Grp Share Discussion Threads

[enfranglais] 22/4/2016 18:21

If you are a m8 of Stewpid's (or even Stewpid himself), you will know he would only do a 'Putin' & appoint someone he has total control over!!!
In the 2 or so hours of phone conversations & dozens of e mails, you get a good impression of the man & anyone who does, is either convinced he is dodgy or turns a blind eye & is probably dodgy too!!!!!!!!!!!
This is of course only my opinion but i can vouch that he lies, is a welcher & anyone with an ounce of common sense (which does not seem to be the case for the 'cult members' here (but i see a few are opening their eyes at last)would know by now he is most probably a sheppards favourite tool!!!lol

[the diddymen] 21/4/2016 13:44

Two years on and no one is any the wiser about the re-list of CICC. No one has a chuffing clue what is going on with the company because they never communicate in a substantive way - and rarely seem to be held to the claims made. They have failed to supply shareholders with accounts for two years and you get the brain dead brigade saying that it is listings rules. If I were CICC I would keep the listing process going ad infinitum, therefore there is no further requirement to submit accounts.

Normal chuffing borrox from the Asylum.

For any share holders in doubt I would take Aymesco up on his offer (visit the asylum on LSE for details). Caveat Emptor etc.

[the diddymen] 18/4/2016 11:03

Mixi is the black hole in your retirement plan getting to you?

[papillon] 15/4/2016 19:11

JoeYangtze
Posts: 776
Off Topic

Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
RE: WhyToday 15:16There is no reluctance by the company to update. However, they cannot update whilst the listing process is being carried out. How many times do you need to be told this? The frustration is huge for everybody, BOD and shareholders, But you cannot break the rules at any stage of the listing process!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Not true, Joe and you know it. In fact it's your usual bullsh*t. Look at FAST for example. They returned from suspension and re-listed on the 31st March and issued an UPDATE on the same day BEFORE their takeover deal has been finalised. There is no reason why CICC/CICG cannot update shareholders.

[sparty1] 15/4/2016 12:07

quiet on here ..message sent aymes :)

[philfromfrance] 13/4/2016 19:40

The 'cult members' are getting restless, except of course the ones with their heads up their r'ses - sore point, after Stewie has been there before their heads got stuck!!! lol
Screwed, shafted, you name it, they keep coming back for more - Stewpid!!!!!!!!

[goulding1215] 08/4/2016 08:28

Takes one to know one.

[papillon] 07/4/2016 13:35

"havegun
Posts: 259
Off Topic

Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
seattle29Today 12:58when we relist ,are you selling up?It would be nice to see you go as you are so negative."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

And you're so thick, havegun!

[the diddymen] 07/4/2016 12:17

HE Nobarsofgold

[soul limbo] 07/4/2016 10:29

CIC Gold perhaps its main man might tell us about his failing bank: where's the money gone?

[the diddymen] 05/4/2016 23:06

Mixi, as ever a sense of deja vu with you! You seem to have been in every dog in the last 10 years and this is no different.

Which poxy exchange will Fatboy have to list on?

The saga continues!

[papillon] 05/4/2016 20:31

I don't doubt that CICG will return from suspension (the LSE is remarkably tolerant to these fantasy companies with a standard listing; look no further than WRN as a prime example). It will return from suspension with a prospective green field site in Mongolia and will join the other companies on the LSE (mostly on AIM) with a prospective green field site and not much else. 10 a penny stocks. Every now and then one comes up trumps and actually announces finding something (like LND yesterday), but most never come to anything (look at the LND share price over the years!) and lose mug shareholders a packet in the process.

[papillon] 05/4/2016 14:42

JoeYangtze
Posts: 770
Off Topic

Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
Graham FyffeToday 10:20Looks like another extremely good appointment. Now would these highly qualified technical experts be joining a company that has no future. I think not. They are joining a company with a strong future. Watch this space.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

LOL. LOL. There are literally hundreds of AIM listed natural resource minnows with "highly qualified technical experts" on their BoD's. I could name scores of these companies. However almost all of these listed companies, without exception, perform dismally with regard to their sp's!! Many never find anything at all and after massively diluting their long suffering shareholders start looking for some other natural resource; usually what is the current flavour of the month!!

These "highly qualified technical experts", often having spent a lifetime working for the likes of a "genuine" natural resource company, such as BLT, or RTZ, are susceptible to the combination of a good salary for doing very little at the AIM listed explorer and often with the added bonus of share options that cost them nothing, that though they are almost without exception likely to expire worthless, could, if by some miracle, come up trumps.

[goulding1215] 05/4/2016 12:32

LOL! Look at the 2 new directors. They are men with experience in the gold sector. They know far more than that decrepit idiot the 'Sherrif of Knotty Ash'. He is trying to protect his short. Ask yourself dopey, why have these 2 men joined the Board of CICGold? With all the ongoing acwwiisotions.

[slowfast] 05/4/2016 12:24

Ermm....why bother announcing a new director?Why bother announcing further acquisitions?
You're showing more impatience than some of the shareholders lol.

[the diddymen] 05/4/2016 11:52

Mixi stop writing bollix on LSE. It is now the second anniversary of the '8 week' delisting of CICC. Are you telling me that they have had a live re-listing underway for two years. It looks as if Seattle is taking a more realistic approach to his/her investment.

Dr TD

[goulding1215] 02/4/2016 22:49

Read your last post again TD.

[lithological heterogeneities] 01/4/2016 16:07

sp holding up well anyway.