We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudified Holdings Limited | LSE:CHL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG3338A1158 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 37.75 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 4.57M | 1.49M | 0.2821 | 1.34 | 1.99M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/4/2016 09:27 | A bit of exuberance here, but not necessarily good news, as it's unclear as to why the Indo's have forfeited. Caution may be prudent here, what happens if they decide to take their ball home and not play any more? | andy | |
14/4/2016 09:25 | lol so you thinking of buying back on dip and giving us your advise again :-) | debbiegee | |
14/4/2016 09:24 | Finely balanced right now, could go either way. I sold out on the spike this morning. Watching very closely now though, any hint of positivity and this will rocket | webshares | |
14/4/2016 09:24 | Could be a RNS of exercise of warrants coming as MMS were quick to mark it up. | top_banana1 | |
14/4/2016 09:23 | I was worried about those warrants been exercised and palmed to punter today | top_banana1 | |
14/4/2016 09:20 | I sold all my chunk in the nice spike, phone trades + online. I got even more than I was hoping, that was a real bonus A very good profit which no sane person would say no to a 1XX%+ gain. Clearly CHL wants the case to continue hence they paid ROI fees, but you will have to wait for a long time and we all know this shares tend to drift when shorters pile in. Good luck all. | top_banana1 | |
14/4/2016 09:19 | What I found interesting about yesterdays trading was how we went so quickly through 20p We just sailed through with all those warrants at 20p which I thought could create some resistance. | debbiegee | |
14/4/2016 09:19 | Sorry RossExcuse my ignoranceI'm confused! Why would roi not pay 200 surely in any decision on monetary penalty they will still have to pay this? So why ruin their chances by not paying 200?So If they don't pay by Wednesday its a slam dunk? | patviera | |
14/4/2016 09:09 | They did not pay up, ok, but CHL has done it for them, so the travesty will go on and on now. Till outcome | 1lilac | |
14/4/2016 09:06 | Not sure what difference the 200 makesIf they don't pay we can still lose the tribunal no? | patviera | |
14/4/2016 09:06 | Here's the delayed sell reporting I spoke about, starting to be listed. People been selling the background/ | 1lilac | |
14/4/2016 09:06 | Seems really strange to just disengage for the sake of 200k. | scotty666 | |
14/4/2016 09:05 | Sorry folks. Be smart, the rampers have been offloading in the background. So CHL has paid for ROI, so arbitration will continue then. You may be locked in while MMS squeeze the impatiens. Look at RSI on daily chart. You will be lucky to sell at 22p by the end of close. Even Debs the most accurate forecaster here saying buy the lows | 1lilac | |
14/4/2016 08:56 | Well, I'm still here and holding all the CHL shares I was holding yesterday morning. Well done to any who made a quick buck on the flurry at 8am. But if CHL do win outright, be it by default or after a full judgement the gains from a quick trade will seem like chickenfeed in comparison to what the longs could make. Seems certain we will have developments in the next 7 days - and the worst that can happen in that timeframe is that ROI come crawling back to the process. Even if ICSID did allow them to continue (and ROI are now in default, so that isn't certain) their credibility is gone and they have shown complete contempt for the process and the authority of ICSID. Either way, (ie judgement by default or ROI are allowed to continue) CHL are closing in on a successful outcome. I'm tied up with work, so won't be posting much today, but will keep an eye on developments. GLA FC | flyingc | |
14/4/2016 08:55 | The decision to proceed would need presidential approval with a UK visit in the same week I doubt Joko would want the additional pain. I wonder if that is why our legal team have set 20 April as the deadline. | pug151 | |
14/4/2016 08:51 | But Debbie if they don't pay the 200 does that mean we definitely win the court tribunal? | patviera | |
14/4/2016 08:50 | Nice balanced post stephen, given the relentless buying most seem to support that the balance has tipped aware of risk on this one. | scotty666 | |
14/4/2016 08:48 | From my own point of view, i prefer my position in this battle and glad i am not backing ROI. The rns yesterday was not definitive, obviously, therefore the price will be all over the place until we get certainty and that only comes from the tribunal, the rest is just wallpaper. My view, like many on here is not ramping but seeing the situation as it unfolds and on that basis, ROI appear to have left the room and the lawyers are discussing settlement because it looks like the ROI have abandoned a lost cause and see no future in carrying on. Uncertainty and doubt remains though as to the amount of compensation will be forthcoming. It is silly to assume now that CHL could still lose all signs indicate the opposite,imho. | stephen1946 | |
14/4/2016 08:45 | pug, I agree, feels like they may actually be getting somewhere. | bones30 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions