We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chapelthorpe | LSE:CPL | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B23VYS91 | ORD 50P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 25.00 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/12/2006 06:48 | 'readicut' [cpl] as it used to be known has been a perenial disappointment. im afraid that the PG buying is no guarantee for survival,let alone profit. he has history of catching falling knives and disappointing his followers; just look at the turgid long goings on at ldsg !!! caveat emptor. | cg1953 | |
15/12/2006 18:34 | Well done timbo. As you say they come in threes and I pulled at the first one but like you I am ever hopeful and will probably reinvest soon. | kingdwg | |
15/12/2006 17:48 | Agreed, it looks risky now. I suspect that at least one of those big million plus trades today was PG topping up. Old Stock market saying: profit warnings normally come in threes. This is number three I think, accordingly I did a small (30K shares) top up today. | timbo003 | |
15/12/2006 17:23 | is it still breathing? Surely there is a very high chance this company will be going under. Looks like the big investors sold out big time. PG was the likely buyer I would have thought | rohkap | |
15/12/2006 15:28 | Remember all that director selling in September - at least there is one thing that the directors can do right. I there any hope left - or are we left with a dog just about breathing? | 25babies | |
01/12/2006 09:31 | Sad that we will not be getting a dividend,I still think we will see some action over the next 12 months. | balcony | |
01/12/2006 09:27 | Much of the loss was goodwill written off so not the end of the world. The results look about as bad as I was expecting. The outlook is pretty poor mind you. | arthur_lame_stocks | |
30/11/2006 19:39 | timbo003 5p is the par value. It doesn't say what Gyll paid but it looks like they mopped up electra's stake. The big trade on Tuesday was at 7.25 with a cross at 7 which equates to the 7.5m. IMO | kingdwg | |
30/11/2006 18:25 | I think Gyllenhammar´s problem is that he doesn´t seem to care how dire a situation is when he invests. He just seems to chase either assets or turnover regardless. He´s worth following though just because he can be a useful agent for change. My largest investment is a PG one (Leeds Group). | arthur_lame_stocks | |
30/11/2006 18:12 | Some turned out very good, i.e. Cape (CIU): 16 bagger Some turned out total pants. ie Carbo (CAB): wipe out I think if you had followed Gyllenhammar in on all his punts since the beginning of the century and were still hanging on in there now, you would be well up and beating the market by a good margin,. I'm tempted to add, but worth noting Gyllenhammar only paid 5p/share, so maybe worth waiting a bit, I think we are probably going lower before we go higher. | timbo003 | |
30/11/2006 18:05 | Not sure if its good news or not. PG investments dont always turn out ok eg European Colour and he doesnt overpay | rohkap | |
30/11/2006 13:33 | Todays news could be the start of something . | balcony | |
28/11/2006 12:35 | Now it's come back as a cross 0.25p less. Funny goings on here? | kingdwg | |
28/11/2006 11:03 | 725000 at 8:27, broker deal, just been deleted!! | kingdwg | |
28/11/2006 08:14 | Could be interesting that one! | kingdwg | |
27/11/2006 20:17 | big trade today. someone getting out? | rohkap | |
12/11/2006 18:38 | Thanks rainydays, I always though it was freehold. | arthur_lame_stocks | |
12/11/2006 14:54 | Yes, I was conscious my calculation may be flawed. Being a trainee beancounter, I should have known the plant and machinery on the balance sheet would have been at historical cost less depreciation, and thus no reflection of market value. The machinery would proberly be rather specialised, and thus, have a realisable value. As you say however, the land and property is [proberly] worth more than the balance sheet says too. | mr_x_uk | |
12/11/2006 14:35 | It depends on what the assets are though doesn´t it. They should make a large profit on the sale of one of their properties soon (about 7m) but then the business itself is performing poorly and there are more losses to come. Their head office is some kind of stately home which is also probably worth much more than its book value and they really ought to think about selling it and leasing something a bit more appropriate now that the business is getting much smaller. | arthur_lame_stocks | |
11/11/2006 16:51 | I've took a crude attempt at making a calculation today, I hope someone can enlighten me here: There are 204,040,900 shares according to the 2006 interim accounts. These are currently on an offer price of 9p. Take the net assets on the balance sheet. I would deduct Goodwill, as that is not a realisable asset (i.e. the goodwill arises, per note 10 of the financial statements, thanks to synergies of having numerous operations working together. If the assets were being punted off, then this wouldn't be up for sale - i.e. it's acquired goodwill). Thus, Net Asset Value after deducting Goodwill = (£36,287,000-£9,274, Isn't this a large discount? | mr_x_uk | |
07/11/2006 19:56 | Sick of exceptional charges obliterating the P&L. I'm sure this year is going to worse than ever. Expecting major goodwill and tangible asset write-offs plus further redundancy costs. I would expect that these will be a major offset to the big property gain on sale going through (hopefully!!!) this years P&L. I bet the big French investors are well pee-ed off as well | rohkap | |
06/11/2006 18:15 | Just dumped all my shares, this company treats shareholders like rubbish. Shame, I was a holder for 7 years. | aussiedonnie |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions