Chaarat Gold Share Discussion Threads

[asturius101] 14/11/2016 17:53

Back to 5p?

[gaaston] 11/11/2016 10:28

Anti elite elections in Europe next spring may well shatter peeps' confidence in money

[richgit] 09/11/2016 13:18

casual47

That is up to investors and whether they wake up to where Gold (at some point)
restarts its true journey beyond $1400 then beyond $1900.


If CGH wont be taken over below 15p and that works its way to maybe not below £1 or £2,then it is a nice place to sit and watch events.

Those still thinking they can get more "volume" of their guaranteed safety 10p stock,may be very wrong.

On a positive note- unless Obama goes fruitcake- We may at least avoid Clinton`s
War.

[casual47] 09/11/2016 12:52

Not sure why you bother posting this here --- CGH will be taken over / delisted well before it gets anywhere near $5000......

[richgit] 09/11/2016 12:43

I have been following someone that got the Election result spot on.

Over the coming months with the deluge of hopelessness coming from Euroland to add
to the seemingly inevitable US recession -the Paper Gold scam is going to be harder to continue,whilst the Silver scam is an obscenity of JP Morgan theft !! .

Whether Mr Rickards is correct, or not,that there has been collusion to allow
China to get their Gold - it could become harder to hide as Physical gets scarcer.

I can see the logic that China does not want Gold soaring when they are trying to amass it,as soaring Gold brings in new masses of competing buyers for Physical.

It certainly is NOT the price of Gold that worries China (as they have already paid $1900) it is the price of Gold attracting others in a declining availability that worries China, when they still want more of it.

If they see their insurance Gold at possibly $20,000 per ounce then they certainly
aren`t bothered about paying $5000.

Smoke and mirrors !?

[juju44] 09/11/2016 08:41

Has to happen for the goldies now

[oli12] 09/11/2016 08:08

Gold up this AM on US news.

[highly geared] 08/11/2016 11:28

Jeez, in profit on my Sipp holding after 2 years. Sit and wait for developments to unfold I think.

[casual47] 08/11/2016 09:49

I'll sit tight until at least they exercise the warrants at 15p.

[[e-mail]] 08/11/2016 09:45

took a chance and sold took a nice earner.

[casual47] 08/11/2016 09:42

If this is Labro then things are looking good.

[oli12] 08/11/2016 09:36

Exactly what we've saying for weeks since the placing and Labro stating their intentions. Off the radar of many

[juju44] 08/11/2016 09:29

Traction here now. Wonder what is going on

[casual47] 07/11/2016 13:56

There are no dead certs for PIs, unfortunately.

Many things can happen here: delisting, takeout at whatever highest price Labro paid (which may be lower than the price PIs could get going forward), or.....they may actually persist with their crazy idea of going into small scale production and use the current share price build-up to offer a great discounted placing for IIs to bring them in (e.g. 6 pence).

[gaaston] 07/11/2016 13:47

A long long time ago an investor advised me to buy in here stating it to be a high reward: high risk stock.... :( am now not too much under water, so let's see how next couple of months' treat our luck. Pity the Chinese haven't come to rescue, being so near on the map too

[oli12] 07/11/2016 10:20

It seems (???) Labro have exercised their warrents and now have 39% holdings .... are they about to take this over. Minimum price they could offer would be 10p....little downside here IMO.

[oli12] 07/11/2016 08:47

Labro buying at 10p now. Still another 30% + 40% rise here in the short term IMO - but yet it's OFF most people's radar.

[oli12] 04/11/2016 14:46

10p paid. Encouraging.

[casual47] 04/11/2016 10:46

They are only locked in until the company gets sold, which may be the goal, to sell it off the market.

what did Dekel say at the investor event?

[oli12] 04/11/2016 10:41

www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/upload/SponsorFile/File/2016_11/Proactive-Presentation-CGH-3-NOV-2016.pdf

Given last night at a proactive investors event

[oli12] 04/11/2016 10:38

I disagree - the only way Dekel and the institutions can easily monetize their shares is if they are listed in the market. Any de-listing pretty much locks all holders in, with limited ways to sell and no way of determining a price, it's not like there are dividends here... any vote by the board or other holders to delist would be nonsensical.

[casual47] 04/11/2016 10:25

Delisting is really only a problem for PIs, as they will lose a market to easily get rid of their shares.

For people like Dekel and IIs being invested in a private company is no problem at all, probably better as it is far less transparent.

[oli12] 04/11/2016 10:11

Delisting requires a 75% majority - I cannot see Labro achieving his at the moment and the board along with friendly holders maintain enough blocking votes.

[oli12] 04/11/2016 10:09

Despite not mining a ounce of gold and little prospect of doing so until 2018/2019 at the earliest the interest shown by Labro is the ONLY way out for a lot of us - we need $100m at least to start a small scale mining operation - dilution like this would wipe us out, management flip flops on strategy and we have geopolitical concerns BUT we do have a lot of gold in the ground.

The reality is this will tick up to the mid teens and hopefully Labro wish to take this private. We have received NO other meaningful offers for the project in the last 5 years, the Chinese don't seem to be interested and given the unpredictability and volatility of AIM stocks getting out with any kind of profit would be an achievement.