We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cambridge Mins. | LSE:CMR | London | Ordinary Share | GB0001826303 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.34 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
02/2/2017 20:18 | As these shares have been suspended for so long can anybody tell me if it is possible to declare them as a loss that can be offset against a capital gain on another investment. Can't realize the loss by selling as they are suspended, and a quick internet search indicated that the Revenue have a classification of 'shares of negligible value' for suspended aim shares but I cannot find CMR in their list. Thanks | john185 | |
29/1/2017 08:39 | Oh yes - management hoping to suck a few more in, plenty of possible investors at the dementia clinic! | targatarga | |
28/1/2017 09:40 | Now, is that last post, irony, sarcasm, or truth? Discuss!! | poseidon2 | |
27/1/2017 19:28 | maxwell - don't fret we will be a listed company in the shake of a lamb's tail. Our directors are on the case. | digger2779 | |
27/1/2017 16:16 | Would appear that we now have one announcement a year which is rephrased 5 or 6 times to give different opinions that mean absolutely less than first thought?!? Or did I misunderstand what was said initially.... | maxwell | |
13/12/2016 05:26 | The vultures are currently feeding off the carcass of the fat lady. The lady selling the Kia Ora may be next. imho | targatarga | |
12/12/2016 22:53 | For those long standers, shortarm, 2trying, oh, lets not forget Mr Curry pasty himselfg...but to name a few... you know who you are......the good old days.. time to turn the lights off. Good luck in all you do. | jle | |
12/12/2016 22:51 | Its a farce, and perhaps even worse. As you see this is a dead duck, save the scavenging feeding off what is left. Sad, but true. The fat lady sang ages ago, except the backing team are backstage waiting for mug punters to think there is some life in the old girl yet... Im afraid not. She has been well and truly sucked dry | jle | |
09/12/2016 13:38 | Any questions and answers at the AGM today or just a voting exercise again. | maxwell | |
09/12/2016 11:55 | So directors will need to fund this themselves now, or go into administration. | whoppy | |
09/12/2016 11:44 | Maybe the details prior to fund raising might have stimulated interest in future investment for heavens sake????? Any idiot can say I was unable to get the funds necessary so all now gone to my asssociate which is just hard luck to all the share holders. | maxwell | |
09/12/2016 10:31 | So another asset given away. So much for the relist then. No doubt they will point out it's not their fault as they did everything they could to raise capital and paid themselves handsomely in the process but alas no more mug punters to fleece. Glencor probably knew this would happen all along so made sure any agreement was loaded in it's favour and then just sat back waiting for a result. | digger2779 | |
09/12/2016 08:06 | A 1.5% NSR might perhaps provide a nice pension pot for some individuals. | lochlea | |
08/12/2016 22:02 | And No mug punters willing to take a punt up the Cam! | targatarga | |
08/12/2016 21:00 | Did anyone go to the AGM today? It sounds like CMR has finally come to an end? No money? No projects? No value? | whoppy | |
08/12/2016 20:35 | Seems to me from the Chairman's blog and mine57's post on here the other day that CMR own nothing at Masa. Now 100% owned by Glencore via dilution from failure to make contribution towards exploration & drilling expenses. So there's no problem over next or further payments. As none required to be made anymore. All CMR have to look forward to is 1.5% NSR........ if the mine ever produces....... unlikely to be for 4-5 years, being realistic. | lochlea | |
08/12/2016 19:39 | Chairman's blog 6th December 2016 Dear Shareholders, Firstly, I would like to apologise for the delay in news since my last Blog on 17th February 2016. Such further news as there was during the year was incorporated in my Chairman’s Report in the Annual Report and Accounts on 14th November 2016, to which I can now add some further news. Masa Valverde The exploration permit for Masa Valverde is held by our Spanish subsidiary Cambridge Mineria Espana SL (“CME”). As you know, CMR has an Investment Agreement with Glencore under which Glencore could earn-in to CME by way of their funding of expenditures; at the same time CMR had the option to match Glencore’s funding in order to retain our share of CME according to milestone levels. However, CMR has not been able to raise further finance in the current harsh climate in commodity markets and mining, and thus could not contribute any funding to CME and therefore Glencore has now completed its earn-in to 100% of CME. That leaves CMR with its entitlement to a 1.5% Net Smelter Return (Royalty)on Masa Valverde. This is potentially very valuable if and when Masa Valverde goes into production at some stage in the future and indeed it underpins the share capital value of CMR. Currently Glencore is evaluating the results of its drilling campaigns at Masa Valverde. A great deal more work is required to take Masa Valverde towards production for which there is no certainty in these volatile economic times. We therefore await further news. Mine57 So how valuable is the 1.5%NSR and when is this site likely to get into full production and aren't you likely to loose that when CMR fail to raise their side of the cash in 12months time or sooner | 1399peter | |
08/12/2016 10:46 | The $19 million deal did not happen | mine57 | |
07/12/2016 21:49 | And - another RNS dated9 April 2009 Did this actually happen ? And if so what happened to that $19 million ? Utterly baffled ( nowt fresh there! ). May I make clear that I am making no accusations against anyone . May I make clear that I am , however , asking and welcoming any input from shareholders , past and present , as this is a discussion board which I assume exists for the exchange of ideas and opinions . Cambridge Mineral Resources plc ('CMR' or 'the Company') Letter of Intent regarding sale of Spanish Subsidiary Cambridge Mineral Resources plc, the mining exploration and production company, announces that it has entered a formal letter of intent in relation to the sale of its wholly-owned Spanish subsidiary, Recursos Metalicos SL ('Recursos'). The buyer will be Direct Response Media Inc. of Nevada, USA. The consideration for the transaction will be US$19,000,000 in a combination of shares and cash. By way of illustration, this equates to in excess of £0.035p per share for CMR. Recursos holds the Lomero-Poyatos mine and the Masa Valverde exploration permits. The sale is subject to all normal reservations and preconditions including due diligence on the part of Direct Response Media. The Company will announce further details in due course. | 2trying | |
05/12/2016 18:10 | Ok, so there mr mine57 goes again, he doesn't ANSWER the questions, he RESPONDS to the questions. Don't be fooled. Its called obfuscating. The questions put were 2 - what , exactly happened with Blue Crest ? So Mine, what EXACTLY happened? Explain here , what where the reasons for not making the 2nd Payment? Who signed the original deal? What were our terms in relation to any missed payments? Who stood to benefit in CMR for this failure? Please feel free to provide a copy of the said agreement on the website? And so on.... It is disingenuous at best to state you 'answer the questions'. 3 - do any past / present directors have any legal / moral responsibility for what I regard as a fiasco re point 2 above ? Why can shareholders not expect an existing Director with a significant interest to answer this question? It is an excellent, and very straightforward question. Let me help you perhaps dilute it into chunks to make it easier to understand. Under the agreement to which you refer to in your answer. do any PAST or PRESENT directors have/had any LEGAL responsibility for its failure. Yes or No? Sigh.. and there he was thinking he was smart , knocking out a response masquerading as answers. Oh, why diluted to 1.5% NSR? | jle | |
05/12/2016 09:48 | In answer to the questions; 1 We are in a Joint Venture (JV), with Glencore on the Masa Val Verde project. At this point in time we have been diluted down to 1.5% NSR (Net Smelter Return). 2 CMR did not meet the terms of the agreement i.e. did not make the 2nd payment under the agreement due on or before 31st December 2008. On the 7th January 2009 Bluecrest took possession of the operating mine under the terms of the agreement which was defaulted which also enabled them to do so under a power of attorney granted to them under the agreement. 3 You couldn't possibly expect me to answer such a question. Thank you. | mine57 | |
04/12/2016 14:26 | I lost nearly as much. Its not bitterness, its the reality. Why waste time giving these people the oxygen to keep spouting their nonsense. Its beyond shameful imo | jle |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions