Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Blckrck.IN.St LSE:BIST London Ordinary Share GB0001297562 ORD 25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.75p -0.70% 105.75p 104.75p 105.50p 106.25p 103.50p 106.25p 475,490.00 16:35:08
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial 0.0 20.1 7.1 15.0 284.35

Blckrck.IN.St Share Discussion Threads

Showing 51 to 75 of 75 messages
Chat Pages: 3  2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
30/11/2016
14:49
If it is any comfort, Numis hold the new Aberdeen team in high regard. This isn't the result I was hoping for, but at least Black Rock got sacked.
tiltonboy
30/11/2016
14:33
Come to think of it - which NAV are they taking the 4% discount from for the cash return? I always use "..Debt at fair value, including income" but I note they're keeping the debt going within the next trust. Fair old difference (c.7p) for the calculation.
spectoacc
30/11/2016
11:29
Poor choice Aberdeen, doesn't inspire confidence that they have kept the same over complicated strategy & given it to a fund who specializes in Emerging markets.On the plus side was expecting a 30% divi cut.
contrarian joe
30/11/2016
10:06
Agreed - the claims being made sound very like the claims BIST were making. Why not just give it over to a proven manager running a trust trading at par. Merger with AUKT seems unnecessarily complex. On the plus side - goodbye Blackrock! You won't be missed.
spectoacc
30/11/2016
10:00
The problem is we are now 18 months from the first incarmation, will we be in the same position in another 18 months when Aberdeen have not cut the mustard, surely this upheaval is destroying capital. The fees and portfolio changes will surely dent qtr 1,2 and 3 in 2017. I think I have learnt a lesson from this. Buy I.T's that are expert in thier fields and have a good spread of I.T's covering different income sources, and manage my own portfolio of I.T's rather than trusting it to one company. Lets hope that LSLI don't bale out to one of these boutique outfits!
getscenic
30/11/2016
09:39
Funniest part of the RNS: "Prior to the strategic review, the Board had been implementing a nil discount control policy through share buybacks at a discount to NAV. In the year ended 30 September 2016 the Company purchased 7.6 million shares pursuant to this policy. " Nil discount policy hasn't been too successful!
spectoacc
30/11/2016
09:17
That assessment is being very kind imv, can think of far more choice words!.
essentialinvestor
30/11/2016
09:16
Yes good point, I misread - it'll be nearer 5% discount after costs I bet, so at c.95% of NAV. Can't say dividend cut is any surprise, but the sort of claims they're making don't inspire confidence: "the Board will also adopt a new investment policy, which targets a truly diversified multi-asset approach to generating highly attractive long-term income and capital returns." Marketing and PR bumpf.
spectoacc
30/11/2016
09:09
40% cash exit is not for BIST shareholder. Its for the Aberdeen shareholders. BIST shareholders are offered a 20% tender at 4% discount to NAV. I'd have bought at 105p but I don't see any point. They are slashing the dividend by 20% so I'd expect this new trust to trade at a healthy discount to NAV,
gbill11
30/11/2016
08:04
RNS - better than I expected - what swings it is the 40% cash exit option at about 97% of NAV. [Edit - actually 20% exit at 96% NAV before costs] Would have preferred them to partner with a zero-discount or even premium Trust, but at least Blackrock will be out the door. The "LIBOR +5.5% target" seems a bit of a laugh though - pick a number! And wonder what the existing manager will do between now and then - presumably not buy into any more "renewables"?
spectoacc
29/11/2016
17:11
Agreed, and at a time when the future of renewabales is under a cloud under Trump
getscenic
29/11/2016
16:35
Only just caught up with Monday's RNS, inc: "We have elected to reduce some of our UK credit holdings and have begun adding to alternative investments related to renewable energy. " Yup, happy that they're reducing "UK credit holdings" but renewable energy?? We're meant to be close to a change of manager! How easy will renewable energy holdings, whatever they might be, be to sell? Smells to me like Blackrock will still be manager after this very long and no doubt "thorough" review.
spectoacc
12/11/2016
11:48
The big seller is now out of the way, Brown shipley now out. Might help the share price but nav sinking daily is depressing. I have to say my passive funds have trounced some of my managed funds this year. Whoever takes this on and if they change the mandate will need time to sort this mess out, looks like another year of so so performance
getscenic
11/11/2016
21:44
Id'e of thought all those bond holdings would be returning more income due to the bond sell off,the downside is the capital loss on buying near or at the peak of the bond bubble as you have pointed out SpectoAcc.Personaly can't see yields rising much further,there seems to me some real value emerging in the bond/proxy type stocks.
contrarian joe
11/11/2016
12:04
NAV hasn't though - still slowly falling.
spectoacc
10/11/2016
11:35
Can tell the world as we know it is ending - BIST has ticked up.
spectoacc
10/11/2016
09:42
Be interesting to see "market rally" NAV, today & tomorrow..
spectoacc
07/11/2016
16:11
there you go, NAV down to 118.82p now.
orinocor
07/11/2016
09:13
Lol yes - if equities are doing badly, they're in equities. If bonds finally look like rolling over, they're in bonds. Only have to look at the chart, they're in their own relentless bear market! Could excuse it if they had conviction & were in out-of-favour sectors, but it's not the case - who'd up their govnt bond exposure when most are yielding next to nothing? How "safe" can they possibly think bonds are, buying here? Hoping someone better will take over as manager, but having sent a rather leading question to BlackRock, got back the most anodyne response, so seems no conclusion to strategic review is imminent.
spectoacc
05/11/2016
10:25
Yes SHRS is much more attractive than BIST. I may revisit BIST if it falls below a quid but even then if NAV keeps relentlessly going down that may not be a bargain. The odd thing with BIST is its NAV keeps trending downwards no matter what.
orinocor
31/10/2016
11:50
20% more than possible - they shifted to a heavier bond weighting recently, right at the time the bond bull market seems to be over. Much the same as they did with their equity exposure! Need to see the next Factsheet to see latest holdings but performance vs the market is so bad, widening discount not a surprise. Shires - a quality player IMO - on a 2% wider discount, & Merchants (not one I'm a fan of for its expensive debt) 2% tighter, so BIST is in the middle, yet by far the worst performer. A shocking lack of impetus on the so-called strategic review too - what's the betting that in December they announce that the strategic review's conclusion is once again to hold a strategic review? " Further to the announcement dated 1 August 2016 of a review into the Company's investment objective and policy, the Board has considered a number of factors. These include the performance of the investment portfolio, the cost of the Company's debt, the cost of paying the dividend and its discount management policy. The Board has now decided to undertake a strategic review and to invite fund management groups, including BlackRock, with both established multi-asset management credentials and the experience of managing listed closed-end funds, to present proposals to the Board. A further announcement will be released as soon as practicable and before the publication of the report and accounts in December 2016" [Edit - just looked up the debt: "The Company also has a 6.25% Bond 2031 in issue, which equates to 17.2% of the Company's net assets."]
spectoacc
31/10/2016
11:15
Ah Mr Ryan. How wide can the discount get?, near 20% to NAV possible?.
essentialinvestor
17/10/2016
09:44
Ryan's dreams less than 9 months ago... "A focus for Ryan in 2016 is to stabilise the discount further in order to hopefully expand the size of the fund. The trust previously traded at around an 8 per cent discount to net asset value, says Ryan, while last year it traded at a small premium. “Long term we would love to grow the trust, but for us to be able to do that we need to make sure there is trading volume to give investors comfort they can get in and out,” he says. “It would be lovely to have the trust as one of the larger ones in the sector.” What a complete failure by Blackrock and more importantly in the past couple of months The Board - I'd vote to sack the lot of them.
wolstencroft
15/10/2016
12:01
Usually the word abysmal covers very poor perfor UImance, but in this case it may not even suffice. There are decent IT available on well over 10% discounts so unless they are going to instigate a strict discount control mechanism in whatever new form BIST takes, it is perhaps difficult to view these as a buy. How liquid are some of the holdings?, "alternatives"for example which comprise a decent % of the fund.
essentialinvestor
14/10/2016
14:50
Lol you're right - some poor souls sold out at under a £ (seems the bid gapped). Underperformance must be mainly govnt bond-related, & fearing we're clearly nearer the top of the bond market than the bottom, doesn't inspire me to go long. I'd have thought a good money-making strategy would be "do the opposite of whatever BIST do".
spectoacc
Chat Pages: 3  2  1
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:33 V: D:20161203 11:41:32