Base Resources Share Discussion Threads

[zjc] 29/5/2001 13:59

PRS, In your original post your comments on the statement refered to "the dioxide risk" that seems to be the centre of Little Tykes discomfort.

[little tyke] 29/5/2001 13:47

PRS
'Good old Labour, huh -as usual they really thought that one through. Never mind the dioxide risk which is enough for the Dutch not to even consider open-air burning, but they didn't even stop to consider the BSE implications on the water table.

VOTE THESE GUYS OUT.

IMHO.'

Your words I believe?


Did you do your degree 15 years ago?

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 13:30

Spongy2: Oh yeh. Right. I can see that...duh. LOL.
Hyper : No mate - the big difference is that BSE will wipe out your lineage forever; rather than just you.

IMHO.

[Made me laugh spongy, thanks.]

[spongy2] 29/5/2001 13:26

Tkon,
You have'nt the foggiest.

Prs, think you may be out of your depth.

[hyper al] 29/5/2001 13:22

Has any research been done on how long prions can survive in the soil?

I don't think we should get over worried about pits, most have been lined with clay and site investigations will have been carried out to check hydrogeology.

I'm far more concerned about animals decaying in fields, as contaminated water could run into rivers and reservoirs.

Did you know that water contaminated with spores from Bracken can cause cancer, so we could get just as worried about that.

With all these concerns with BSE, I hope you all hold PRM.

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 13:16

spongy2: Dividend tax credit?

[tkon] 29/5/2001 13:16

spongy2,

So you don't believe in questioning figures or caveat emptor then?

Dave,

What's all this with the PhD -v- BA nonsense? Not the usual scientists "if we knock his credentials, we'll discredit his ideas / research", is it?

The Knight of No.

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 13:12

Tyke - Are you taking drugs?
The "original post" is at the top of the page...
The original link is with it.
The original guy is the government top BSE man - according to the link.

Geez luise.

[It would appear - totally by coincidence - that I share the guys name (Peter Smith), but I'd have hoped a Phd was sufficient to figure that out. Follow the bloody link, never mind what I say if you don't like it, just read the bloody link.]

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 10:48

Been filling your Glass with water again, I see.
[I guess post 52 was a bit too challenging for the old grey matter, huh...]

[m.t.glass] 29/5/2001 10:42

tee hee :O)

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 10:09

?

No wonder they win ; no wonder you lose.

[flybywyre] 29/5/2001 10:08

Poor old PRS, rattled and in a corner. Somewhat like the "Tory" party.

Regards
FBW

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 00:52

Hilda: see post 18.

[i rely on balls] 29/5/2001 00:24

mtglass.
As long as they can get away with it they will keep on doing it. Putting info on labels is useless, they just print smaller and smaller labels.
Fineing them is useless, they add it on to the price.
Not voting for them is useless, you end up with even bigger fools running things.
The consumer, as usual is on a hidin to nothing.
Parliament should be downgraded/abolished, before they vote themselves their next 40% pay increase in June/july..
All serious issues should be put to the common vote on the internet.

[clem] 29/5/2001 00:10

MT Glass. Drink really old wine. Get an allotment. :)

[peterreidsmith] 29/5/2001 00:04

see post 30.

[hilda] 29/5/2001 00:03

Peter, you can repeat yourself over and over, but it looks like the message is that no one realy believes it

[lightning] 28/5/2001 22:14

Unfortunately, whoever you vote for the government always gets in.

[i rely on balls] 28/5/2001 22:04

He vill be back, mit more flimflam.

[m.t.glass] 28/5/2001 21:50

Game, set and match.

PRS u R the weakest link.

Goodbye.

[flybywyre] 28/5/2001 21:44

Well that seems to have shut PRS up doesn't it.