We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baron Oil Plc | LSE:BOIL | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01QGH57 | ORD 0.025P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.002 | -3.51% | 0.055 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.0575 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 594,534,570 | 16:22:53 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 0 | -1.39M | -0.0001 | -5.00 | 9.49M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
07/2/2017 16:11 | Still much news needed and some very overdue xxi farmout plan drill this year, union cash banked and Asia deal need to happen soon | pembury | |
07/2/2017 13:23 | Online price for 1M at 0.386. Very rare I can sell a million online in one chunk | petecb1 | |
07/2/2017 13:20 | I can sell 250k for 0.43... | petecb1 | |
07/2/2017 12:42 | The fall in share price this morning was due to the correction in the stated bid ask prices yesterday. Yesterday's share price was way over what shares were actually being bought and sold for. Today's prices are also a bit off. It's more like 38 v 43 so a mid price of around 40. Some people are liking yesterday's news by the looks of some trades over the past two days. | joetricky | |
07/2/2017 12:26 | Blvn Bowleven shar holders want a change of BOD o we there and the share price surges. Who are the active parties and can we mimic their actions? They want cash in hand used in better way by more competent persons, in their view. | valentine | |
07/2/2017 08:16 | I think shareholders old and new want to know where our next income dollar is coming from. | nlmbidc | |
07/2/2017 08:12 | The share price is down today because there was more sells than buys. This caught the auto trading out and resulted in two price monitoring extension RNS's. | nlmbidc | |
07/2/2017 08:01 | yep usual manipulated sh1te. down -16% and back to 0.35p without 1 share being traded yet today | pembury | |
07/2/2017 07:42 | I assume the 5p soooooooon! is tounge-in-cheek, as this company's share price will never reach that level again. I wouldn't even describe the RNS as "excellent". It was a bit of good news which we long-suffering shareholders in this pile of rubbish have deserved for a long time. Problem is that we're now unlikely to see another RNS like yesterday's one for many weeks/months, during which time the share price will have fallen back again to the levels of last week. The only thing to keep yesterday's momentum alive and justify the salaries that this management have been regularly drawing while their shareholders have seen their investments decimated, is for these people to display a bit of confidence in the continuing future of this company and buy some meaningful amounts of stock on the open market. | tommo41 | |
06/2/2017 18:58 | excellent RNS 5p sooooooon ! | redhill | |
06/2/2017 17:15 | I need a 15 x increase to get out approx even. I'll take ten.. oh dear how many times have I heard it? Sell the stuff into Piura city is the plan and move to Mexico . Uh that deal died with Rudolph.. come on.. so close, now, to having to sell this lot for buttons . | valentine | |
06/2/2017 16:30 | apfindley. Those figures are for three leads, the first well location over one million acres offshore The independent CPR for the block confirms a P50 of over 2bn barrels I believe there are 14-15 main leads post 3D seimsic results Looks like you owe reggie an apology! | pembury | |
06/2/2017 16:26 | There it is. 2mil delayed sell. That explains the false price. | joetricky | |
06/2/2017 15:49 | Not as big as the whoppers the MM'S are dishing out. They're showing mid price of 47 yet I can buy 1mil for 45 and sell for 36 !!!! | joetricky | |
06/2/2017 15:41 | A lot of lies being posted about the prospects here. Someone even trying to say 2.2bn over on Lse as he tries to compare it to bahamas petroleum.The "unrisked" "best" estimate is however much lower....so if you want an idea of the "risked" "mean" figures then reduce the figures below by 50%.Still good, but not exactly the 2.2bn "mean" which the moron called "reggie72" is trying to lie about over on the lse bahamas board.."offshore, deep-water Block Z-34, estimates of Gross Unrisked Best Estimate (P50) Prospective Resources for the three Prospects that have been remapped are:CUY: 413 Million Barrels of Oil Recoverable CUY SUR: 200 Million Barrels of Oil Recoverable DAPHNE: 272 Million Barrels of Oil Recoverable | apfindley | |
06/2/2017 15:27 | Can we finish top of the leaderboard today?? | oildon11 | |
06/2/2017 14:31 | This is good news. It's a step closer and like the RNS says the cost of drilling ships at this time is as good as it gets. Brent has been in the mid 50's since Xmas so hopefully found a new Base price with a rise from there. It makes sense to drill at cheap prices, find a massive carbon source and sit and wait for the oil price to rise. If we are thinking it then the real shakers and movers are thinking about it too. | joetricky | |
06/2/2017 14:15 | Major next steps hopefully soon Cash in and Union farmout asap It's all about momentum so please don't let this die down again!!!! Big step securing a well position today (out of 90 locations) | pembury | |
06/2/2017 14:10 | For how long though ? | az209 | |
06/2/2017 13:44 | Anyone getting in at these levels on that news should be very pleased with themselves! | oildon11 | |
06/2/2017 13:43 | Great news the sleeping gaint in our hand has just had his feathers ruffled ! | oildon11 | |
06/2/2017 12:30 | The $2 million is subject to 30% tax. It cannot be written off against anything else unfortunately. | nlmbidc | |
06/2/2017 11:58 | I wonder how they define "shortly" in terms of getting the final signature to the page.... we have heard this many times and three years on we are still awaiting finalisation and our $2m. Question - surely under the SPA the $2M would have attracted interest (basic provision - or was Boil too naïve to include?) and they say receipt subject to tax - yes, but surely they have bags of costs they can set against even on a ring-fenced basis..... so despite being liable to tax it should be fully covered by past cost allocation? | simon8 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions