08/02/2016 05:54:12 Cookie Policy +44 (0) 207 0700 961 Free Membership Login

You’ve just added your first Follow! This is a brand new feature that will be at the core of several new tools and personalized information feeds that are coming soon.

You can see your current Follow list as a Monitor list here.

Please continue to add stocks to your Follow list so that when the new tools and feeds roll out, you’ll immediately get to make use of them! We will alert early adopters of the Follow list to these new features first.

AT Communications Share Chat (ATCG)

Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
AT Communications Group LSE:ATCG London Ordinary Share GB00B0C8K346 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 3.875p 0.00p 0.00p - - - 0 05:00:10
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Software & Computer Services - - - - 2.98

AT Communications Share Discussion Threads

Showing 2801 to 2817 of 2825 messages
Post New Message
Chat Pages: 113  112  111  110  109  108  107  106  105  104  103  102  >>
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
29/8/2009
10:12
I will not buy foreign companies and I am not buying small UK companies any more. I have been burnt too many times.tyranosaurus
23/8/2009
13:59
This sort of thing always makes me question the so called wisdom of those who will not buy foreign companies, such as Chinese or Indian, because 'they cant be trusted' Many UK plcs fall into that catagory so the risk premium on the Chinese stuff is unwarranted IMO.stegrego
04/8/2009
16:09
Virtually deja-vu!egoi
04/8/2009
09:00
I would say you are spot on Masurenguy. I was watching this one and I was thinking of buying but in the end I didn't and I was lucky it seems but I was very close to it. Although I have not lost here like many others who try thier luck on Aim will loose out sometimes and it is painfull I know having just lost out on Irvine Energy.....although slimmest hope of a few pence back Sorry for those of you who have lostyorgi
04/8/2009
08:36
You may be right nickduk but that's a risk with lightly regulated AIM companies. Also don't forget that some directors were burned here too as shareholders. For starters, former FD Ian Crawley bought nearly 1m of shares at an average price of around 40p and as far as I'm aware still holds them !masurenguy
04/8/2009
07:42
That's the risk you take with AIM stocks and small caps - at one extreme some will 5 or 10 bag and at the other they will go to zero ! This company expanded through acquisition by over-leveraging itself in a bull market and was then caught out with far too much debt when the crash happened last year.masurenguy
04/8/2009
07:31
This is another example of why investing in small companies is a bad idea. Inevitably the shareholders are the first to get shafted. This has happened several times to me.tyranosaurus
04/8/2009
07:22
Within less than 24hrs a buyer found for atcg assets.Oh what a ROTTEN EGG SCENARIO. Why on earth could the board not do the deal & perhaps secure shareholders some cash.cocker
04/8/2009
00:20
KBC were right!moonlover
03/8/2009
21:06
Jasper - creditors always take precedence over shareholders. The bank is first in the queue - I think they are owed 8m - then there are all of the other creditors, the employees, the C and E for VAT, the IR for CT etc etc - as Stegrego says - there will nothing for shareholders whatever deal is done.masurenguy
03/8/2009
20:56
Id imagine they will just buy the assets from the administrator and current shareholders get zip.stegrego
03/8/2009
20:51
if they buyout the plc, then wont Daisy offer shareholders the last price, prior to suspension?jasper28
03/8/2009
20:30
Probably some good synergy there for Daisy but I wouldn't hold out much hope for any payout to shareholders since the bank will have preferred creditor status after the Administrator has charged his fees.masurenguy
03/8/2009
20:14
Rumour going around the shop floor that Daisy have bought the whole company outright, RNS tomorrow? Would this mean a possible payout for existing shareholders?jasper28
03/8/2009
14:33
Trouble is Dd, (I don't hold), as at infonic as far as anyone can tell everything was done by the book (incredibly they supposedly lost 9.4 million in their last six months - about 80k a day, where it 'went' is quite a mystery from the accounts to me!) double the first half, without a profit warning, but within 48 hours of going into admin a team including management had 'supposedly' put together a bid to buy from the administrator. Private shareholders lost the lot of course. Their is an Infonic action group but they don't seem to be getting anywhere. Yet it was all apparently above board and that is the sort of scenario I can envisage here for private shareholders, if a buyer from the administrators emerges. Without wishing to sound defeatist, I can't see what course of action they have open to them, in either case.egoi
03/8/2009
14:03
I really think we need to get to the bottom of what happened here.....Too many changes in personnel and directors for this not to have been known many months ago or there to have been something that needs accounting for to shareholders.davidosh
03/8/2009
13:57
well thats all folks......sorry for your losses, but that latest RNS is the fat lady singingrecruiter
Chat Pages: 113  112  111  110  109  108  107  106  105  104  103  102  >>


Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:34 V: D:20160208 05:54:12