Assetco Share Discussion Threads

[rorrys] 10/9/2011 00:37

You are a classic example of why emmotional people should not get involved in the buying and selling of shares and other financial investments.
You let your emmotions cloud your judgement and become to attached to a share.
You should learn to be more indifferent and analytical about your investments.
Your the blundering type who thinks because you say something will happen you think it should and when it doesn`t materialise you blame everything else except your own poor judgement.
Had you listened to my advice you would have saved yourself a considerable amount of money .You are blind to others opinions and have a closed mind, if it does not fit in with what you think should happen then it must be wrong.
You will also not learn from this and continue along that path.
That is your type I am afraid.

[rorrys] 10/9/2011 00:32

Your the one who`s making the childish threats lol ,perhaps if you hadn`t made such a fool of yourself on this thread you wouldnt feel so inadequate.

[caledoniaman1] 10/9/2011 00:10

Good behind a keyboard weedy - what about in real life you insignificant weedy little man.

[rorrys] 09/9/2011 23:40

Caledoniaman1 - 25 Aug 2011 - 11:17:13 - 1879 of 2121
I feel a rush coming on very soon to buy these - and they won't be at 2.7p for long !! Court case should be a fait accompli - the company debtors will jump at the chance of say 25p in the £ as opposed to SFA - upwards and onwards with this potentially excellent company that has simply been mis-managed in terms of debt control. AIMHO
Assetco rocking on since ASF takeover - ASTO

Caledoniaman1 - 25 Aug 2011 - 10:57:52 - 1876 of 2121
I now feel very confident that Assetco will be saved and existing shareholders can expect a sharp spike upwards imminantly. The court will almost inevitably grant approval to the motions proposed. The government seem to have managed to supress this story so far, however they must be under pressure to find a resolution very soon before they have egg all over their faces re this PFI & London / Lincolnshire Fire Services. I e-mailed SKY News twice several weeks ago asking them why there had been no coverage on this potentially exposive situation - and still nothing !! This is being hushed up in my opinion until a solution is found to keep the company trading. AIMHO

[stegrego] 09/9/2011 23:26

Hmmm
Looks like the same old story here.
People were warned about this months ago, but chose to shout down naysayers.

Now look, they are all seething, yet only have themselves to blame.

Loads of great solid companies out there, so why bet on lost causes?

[rorrys] 09/9/2011 17:56

I told you and told you and told you EXACTLY what was going to happen and all you could do was deride me and ignore my cold hard truths.
You are an idiot.
It is as plain and simple as that.
I warned and warned you but you thought you knew better.
Next time when you find yourself in a hole like this........STOP DIGGING!!
Listen when someone tells you what you dont want to hear and look into it instead of burying your head in the sand.
Rampers like treacle thrive on idiots ,dont let it happen again.
Dont remain an idiot learn to ignore people who promise you quick easy riches cause there is NO SUCH THING.
Ask yourself WHY does the market value this co at X when everyone else is saying it should be Y
And remember if it looks to good to be true etc etc

[greedfear] 09/9/2011 17:21

EC- Thanks and you're probably right that it's not going to matter.

Have a nice weekend!

(edit: all of you (and I mean all) have a nice weekend!)

[grannyboy] 09/9/2011 17:17

"YES SKINT CAVEMEN".....

[greedfear] 09/9/2011 17:15

Yes, I learn from my mistakes and try to make the best out of the current situation. There's nothing to learn from the 'told-you-so' people and people that see no other options than the obvious. If we would all accept what is there would never be any progress and we would all be walking around like cavemen.

[effortless cool] 09/9/2011 17:14

I would vote an impotent 'no' rather than an irrelevant 'yes'.

At the end of the day, unfortunately, it's not going to matter.

[greedfear] 09/9/2011 17:09

EC- yes, that bribe pot is the tricky part.

Obviously you don't hold shares, but do you have any idea what you would vote if?
I'll appreciate you vision on this. Cheers!

[rorrys] 09/9/2011 17:05

160 mill of the 250 mill shares in circulation are held by the instis backing this deal.

[grannyboy] 09/9/2011 17:03

greedfear you are totaly delusional, except you've made a monumental mistake and hopefully learn from it??.. And well done RorryS for trying to warn investors!!!!..

[greedfear] 09/9/2011 17:03

It's probably going to be a very interesting meeting. I think we're talking special resolutions here. Then a 75% majority is needed.

Mr. Shannon is holding almost 27 million shares. I can imagine him voting 'no'.
They're going to have to need 81 million yes-voters then while they currently have 57.4 million in favour.
They're going to need some more.

(If I vote no [I probably will] they can add a couple of million needed yes-voters to it).

In other words: down, but not out (yet). lol

[effortless cool] 09/9/2011 17:02

RorryS,

Given the crass error you made earlier (post 2084), you're hardly in a position to call anyone stupid (except yourself, of course).

[effortless cool] 09/9/2011 17:01

There's a little bribe pot to make sure it gets voted through.

25 per cent. of the Placing Shares will be offered to a limited number of other institutional shareholders on the same terms. To the extent that they are not taken up, the Investors have undertaken to subscribe for these Placing Shares. Existing Shareholders excluding the Investors, will hold 17.6 per cent. of the New Ordinary Shares following the Placing should they take up 25 per cent. of Placing Shares.

[rorrys] 09/9/2011 16:58

Be under no illusions ther are NO alternatives.
It is accept this or nothing,nada, zilch, get it ?

[rorrys] 09/9/2011 16:55

The relevant part of the statement that you should be taking note of.

"SELL IT ON LESS FAVOURABLE TERMS "

How stupid are you ? I mean really ? you have gone way beyond my previous estimation.

First , your vote is worthless and will mean absolutely NOTHING!!!!!! along with all the other PI,s votes.
OVER!!!!! 160 mill of the 250 mill shares in circulation are held by the instis backing this deal.

Secondly , how many times do you have to be told , its history repeating itself again and again with you innit!!!
IF!!!!! any company is interested in a takeover it will be at a much "WORSE" price than the current one being offered.
THE COMPANY JUST TOLD YOU THAT TODAY !!!
THEY SCREAMED IT AT YOU IN FACT.
Jeeeeeeeeeeeese

[greedfear] 09/9/2011 16:48

I'm not clutching at straws I'm considering the alternatives.
I'm going to have to as I want to vote and want to make the right decision.

If the resolutions are passed I'll have an immediate loss of 90%.

If the resolutions are not passed:

1. Chance of losing the other 10% as well (but have the satisfaction that the investors group [who obviously had no consideration with the current shareholders] did not get what they want, are probably f.. too);

2. Chance of getting a better deal from the investors group as they probably don't want to lose it all as well;

3. Chance of a white knight (take over bid) giving me a better deal then the current one [and like I said before maybe that buyer is allready there and keeping a very low profile].