We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angel Biotech | LSE:ABH | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0HZJ337 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.05 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
31/1/2013 23:13 | And ginger Peg, remember the 15 million sold at .68 ? How do you think I know who I sold them to that sunny morning almost two years ago? You never was, and never could have been a contender, and now you know. Good night. | knocknock | |
31/1/2013 23:12 | The ECJ ruling was circumnavigated to allow the manufacturing process to be patented and not the actual cell line.The work with Pfizer was to show that a sustainable manufacturing process was achievable for the AMD cell line.All money and profit from stem cell work was not reinvested into the stem cell side but used to chase the biosimilar dream.The MRC was well aware of what was happening at Angel | pegasus59 | |
31/1/2013 23:04 | 9 years??? Does that include the failure of Angel Biotechnology Ltd that went bust prior to the PLC ? | knocknock | |
31/1/2013 23:03 | At the last count and declaration by you Pegasus you stated you owned 65 million shares at a .10 average, one can assume you have averaged down further so let's see if you have the balls to declare your true position at this present moment in time. Just so we can avoid any ambiguity going forward I am happy to declare that I own no ABH shares at present and have no intention of ever owning any in the future. | knocknock | |
31/1/2013 22:58 | I wonder just how much money you have lost Peg. It has got to be alot more than you could aford. 9 years of TOTAL FAILURE, loss, poor strategy, mismanagement, grand ideas that come to nought, and basic fleecing of investors like YOU, and you still expect, indeed, they still expect people to believe they may have another cunning plan. Its almost unbelievable, except we have watch the misery unfold here over the years. Anyway, you were told so dont say it was unexpected. 9 years of failure. If i was responsible for that, i would be ashamed of myself. Lav | laverato | |
31/1/2013 22:49 | Harper wanted the company to be manufacturing interferon and GCSF.Funds were held back from the stem cell side of the business development.Stem cells might be back on the menu. | pegasus59 | |
31/1/2013 22:32 | Not the "company" the "consortium"So we have Fujifilm dyosnth,Sire life sciences,SCM pharma and Broughton labs.But one other piece is needed to fit it all togetherIt's sure to become visible shortly | pegasus59 | |
31/1/2013 22:26 | Whoopee the company have a plan according to Dave the mechanic lets all invest in this world class biotech company who really know how to deliver on their promises. | knocknock | |
31/1/2013 22:24 | The plan ? according to ??????? ? is to provide this technology to Pharma customers both as a contract manufacturing organisation (CMO) and in collaboration with other contractors capable of current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) quality production. | pegasus59 | |
31/1/2013 22:17 | Go away ginger, you are toast. | knocknock | |
31/1/2013 22:09 | So we have a shorter praying for the company to be suspended and fold so he doesn't have to close the short.Has anyone noticed lavvyheed has got the genetic wiggy "of"gene?Always such anger when large buys go through at the end of the day.If this turns around we will see a shorter massacred.I think the ferocity and frequency of posts by the shorty team is now to be put to the test.Not long to find out one way or another.Consortium to pay upfront costs?For what to be manufactured in the fully licensed Cramlington.Why so much interaction with Fujifilm dyosnth?Better keep those fingers and toes crossed wiggy | pegasus59 | |
31/1/2013 22:07 | end game is nigh! last rns was rook to bishop 4. next move is check-mate to the russians! | rocket fuel | |
31/1/2013 22:05 | How I love the death throws, And watching cornered bulls Try and beat Knocknock the Matador , with giant balls. Red flags all around the ginger Peg nowhere to be found Will tomorrow be the day The bulls get put in the ground? Six foot down ain't deep enough For this pile of pooh Best look for a deeper sewer To bury one or two................. | knocknock | |
31/1/2013 21:45 | "..will make it impossible for the Company to continue trading..." | rocket fuel | |
31/1/2013 21:41 | "Your Board believes that both agreements and the arrangements for pre-funding are essential to the ongoing viability of the Company. The pre-funding arrangements need to be concluded rapidly and the agreements for both the MMH joint venture and the CMO business strategic partnership need to be concluded before the end of March 2013 given the cash currently available to the Company. In the absence of other developments, failure to conclude either agreement or their respective pre-funding arrangements will make it impossible for the Company to continue trading. Whilst the discussions so far have given the Board confidence in the enthusiasm of all parties to conclude these two sets of agreements, there can be no assurance that either or both will be concluded.." | rocket fuel | |
31/1/2013 21:11 | You really are sounding like someone who was personally involved in the dismal management of this company. It does not matter what sector one operates in, to make such positive statements and repeatedly raise money on the back of them and to then not only completely fail to realise any of these stated objectives let alone then run out of money is total incompetence. To then be expected to be paid for it is morally repugnant. As for me understanding the business model, do you think that any investor is able to look back and say that they understood the business model when they have at best been misled and at worst been utterly hoodwinked, with the reality being that the company was just a pack of cards waiting to fall down. Only an insider would have known this and bother to defend this now. Why are you so keen to defend the indefensible? | edinstead | |
31/1/2013 21:11 | .....looking forward to a period of unpresedented growth......should that not have read........we may or may not be able to pull this off. Its by no means certain that any orders will be had and the rather large Director payroll will still be met, either way, so place your bets. £800 per day for consultation, + expenses i believe for a Doc. Wow, i wonder what sort of advice you get for £150 a day from a average manager dragged off the street. Probably somthing like...... .......F--K me guys, this is a massively risky expansion plan, not using ANY of your own money. As you have clearly FAILED to make a profit in 9 YEARS, and clearly dont know HOW to manage a balance sheet, why dont you be honest with your investors and WRAP IT UP now, without raising another few million, which you dont really know how to use to any real effect. You seem to be very busy at being very busy. Its not working, STOP. Thats what he might of said for £150. So 9 years, on 2 days a week Consultation fee of £800 per day. Well, go figure. | laverato | |
31/1/2013 21:05 | basically, if no ruskies turn up in scotland by the end of feb then abh will have to request a suspension in the Company's shares pending clarification of the Company's financial position. | rocket fuel | |
31/1/2013 20:56 | hedge, the russians are not even bothering to fill in their visa applications in the required field never mind signing a jv in the next few weeks. why would they charge in at the 11th hour when they have been dragging their feet for the last two years? | rocket fuel | |
31/1/2013 20:33 | Please explain (in layman's terms)why many investor's be it chancer's & gamblers or staunch angel support's are losing so much money. Look back at what was issued in term's of RNS releases alone going back to last June... Forget the biotech business acumen, the protracted insinuated conjectural aspiration are there for all to see which encouraged PI/II investment. Just because the chips didn't fall your, the company or anybody else's way doesn't give grounds for the defensive statements you allude. You're correct in your assumption my Contract Management background doesn't extend to the bio sector, however it does pertain to the securement of business at minimal risk. The finacial risk here was never the company's... it was our's...!! Though looking at the spin, who would have thought....? | hedgehog33 | |
31/1/2013 20:06 | Excuses....! | hedgehog33 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions