Advanced Oncotherapy Share Discussion Threads

[daijavu] 16/9/2016 13:01

Everything that comes out of AVO indicates that they are confident that they will succeed in providing the world with cheap proton therapy. It is good to be part of it.

[twirl] 16/9/2016 09:44

Interview with Michael Sinclair from 3 days ago

Interesting that refers to the first 6 in chronological order being 2 UK, 2 China, Italy and another China. The Italian and further China installations are new to me.

Also in 4th video states that all providers will be contracted through the mtce agreement with AVO to provide 2 free hours each day to children in the locational catchment area. This arises from increasing treatment hours from 12 to 14 per day 6 days pw.

[daijavu] 15/9/2016 09:33

It was clear from early on that Harley Street was intended to be the showcase to attract buyers so I've always thought that orders might be difficult to get until the first LIGHT machine was up and running. AVO set out the timetable for that in 2015. The timetable made it clear that testing would take until the end of 2016 and that would be followed by the regulatory approval process with the first patient due to be treated in Harley Street towards the end of 2017.

It is also clear that no work can be carried out at Harley Street until planning approval is obtained. I think that we we must be quite close to getting a decision and I am fairly confident that planning permission will be given because the Planning Authority will only withhold it if they have very sound reasons to do so that they believe will stand up at an appeal or in Court, if HdW took it that far. From what I have read of the objections and the reports and comments from official bodies such as the Environment Agency and other Departments, the only substantive objections appear to relate to the construction work and then the movement of vehicles when the facility is operational. The radiation issue raised by the objectors was dealt with by the Environment Agency faily early on.

Milestone payments from Synophi are dependent on progress with Harley Street and the LIGHT machine so getting planning permission, starting construction and completing the testing of LIGHT should trigger those and might even win some more cotracts.

It was always going to be a waiting game.

[igbertsponk] 15/9/2016 08:56

It surely should stay at the current level if orders are announced, and dive if they're not.

[twirl] 15/9/2016 08:43

testing as expected to be complete by end Dec

[pyglet] 14/9/2016 21:20

It will only reach 250 if orders are announced, nothing else will do.

[pyglet] 14/9/2016 21:19

SP has to get to 250 twirl. How do you expect this to happen?

[twirl] 14/9/2016 13:53

lazy unresearched rubbish as usual from TW.

The co has virtually committed itself to a placing for reasons set out in the rns at 250p plus with the Metric deal.

[gerhart] 10/9/2016 22:31

I agree with that Haydock. Very impressive CV. Suspect he wouldn't be here on a whim or just for a salary.

[haydock] 09/9/2016 10:28

The new man is far more interesting & relevant, to the story.
Just feel the calibre & the contacts.

[daijavu] 08/9/2016 21:00

I tried another way but that didn't work either

[daijavu] 08/9/2016 20:15

Thanks Glibgibon. I'm having another go as well.

[glibgibon] 08/9/2016 00:30

Looks like the files are only stored for a short time. Try uploading to the viewer and if that doesn't work let me know and I will try to save them somewhere.

[daijavu] 06/9/2016 09:08

Thanks Glibgibon.

I tried to access it thet way you suggested but ended up with a timed out message.
I know I'm doing something wrong and I will keep on trying until I get there.

Thanks again

daijavu

[glibgibon] 05/9/2016 23:25

Daijavu, not sure if it's too late now, but you could download that msg file and upload it here. You will be able to see the message and 4 attachments.


Not sure if the links are only temporary, but this is what I get:
From: Alistair Grills Associates
Sent: 22 July 2016 16:12
To: Quayle, Paul
Cc: 'Nick Campsie'
Subject: RE: 141-143 Harley Street & 28-29 Devonshire Mews West, London W1 - WCC App Ref 16/05372/FULL - Objection from Residents

Dear Paul

Further to our e.mail exchanges, I now attach copies of a comprehensive letter of objection and supporting documentation in respect of the above application, submitted on behalf of the residents of 12 No properties in the immediate or near vicinity.

The submission includes:

AGA’s overview letter of objection - submitted on behalf of the residents listed at the end of the letter;
Sol’s independent Acoustic & Vibration Audit of the submission;
ADL’s independent Transport Audit of the submission; and
ADL’s summary covering objection letter with the above independent Transport Audit.

Please note I will be on holiday from 25th July to 12th August now, excluding 1st – 3rd August, when I should be contactable if you have any queries.

In the mean time, I’d be grateful if you would kindly acknowledge receipt of this objection. [Email confirmation sent 25.7.16]

Many thanks

Kind Regards

Alistair

[daijavu] 02/9/2016 10:46

Thanks for the offer IgbertSponk but I'll pass if you don't mind. My problem is with pdf. Everything I download at the moment defaults to pdf and if pdf can't open it I'm stuck. It's something I'll have to work on to correct.

I've looked at one of the other objections that appears to cover the same ground so I don't think I need to see more to get the message.

However, the comment dated the 26th April submitted by the Environment Agency who are responsible for dealing with the radiation issue, clearly indicates that the anticipated radiation is far enough within accepted safety limits that the equipment can be approved for use at that site without further consideration. It appears to put that particular aspect to rest.

[igbertsponk] 30/8/2016 09:59

daijavu - if you put your email address up here I'll send it to you. Can't copy as a pdf.

[daijavu] 30/8/2016 09:15

I was reading postings by others over on lse that were supposed to be transcripts of the objections. Do you think you could copy the whole thing on here?

[daijavu] 27/8/2016 08:53

I've managed to read the objections from the consultants engaged by the residents. The consultant's objections do not include any reference to a radiation hazard. Presumably the consultants feel radiation has been effectively ruled out as an issue by the relevant regulator earlier in the year.

[daijavu] 23/8/2016 16:13

I'm sorry if I doubted you, igbert. I don't imagine for an instant that I could deflect your or anyone else's thoughts away from the objections and I have no interest in pigeonholing you as a troll or anything else. I was merely wondering why you seemed so biased against the application. But as you say you like the company, you are clearly not biased. If by proving, you mean supplying information, please go ahead. We cannot have to much information.

I am having dificulty opening the objection from Alistair Grills so if anyone could copy and paste the contents here I would appreciate it.

[igbertsponk] 23/8/2016 15:44

I don't assume people are that thick really twirl. People buy or sell based on their own opinions. If I add a little factual info I'm sure they'll appreciate it.

[twirl] 23/8/2016 14:59

Normally one who is wishing to invest in a company would like the price to fall and increase the potential for gains or reduce the risk of loss.

That attitude can lead one into trying to encourage people to sell - eh Igbert.

[igbertsponk] 23/8/2016 14:40

Nope, nothing personal at all.

As I keep saying, I LIKE the company. Just drawing attention to the risks I perceive which currently prevent me investing. And if people suggest those risks are imaginary, such as the "Anna Dunphy of Walbrook says there are no objections" comment above, then I'll happily prove otherwise.

But perhaps you're just trying to deflect my thoughts (and others) away from the objections and pigeonhole me as a nasty troll ?