ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

ACV Advance Visual

0.16
0.00 (0.00%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Advance Visual LSE:ACV London Ordinary Share GB0002565355 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.16 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Advance Visual Communications Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1401 to 1424 of 1675 messages
Chat Pages: 67  66  65  64  63  62  61  60  59  58  57  56  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/10/2006
18:10
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
09/10/2006
18:08
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
09/10/2006
18:06
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
09/10/2006
07:56
Takdeer/Sadika/SmilerXX(and any other new aliases you are using) -

Glad to see that you have started looking at PSM. Hopefully your minimal research will help you to understand that the majority of Barclay and Shaw's current efforts will be spent trying to finalise the deal for PSM.

Did you research RMR/EAM like I suggested?

I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RTO.
Here's my previous post again just to remind you:

Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again.

FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW).

Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly.

Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors?

Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO.

RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)?
Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board?

So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p.

4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps!

Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you?

If you do phone Barclay, please ask him if the deals for his other shells are likley to be as poor for shareholders as Ricmore was? Ask him if there is any chance of a credible trading company reversing into any of them. Ask him if he and Shaw will be investing in other potential vendor companies prior to any RTO, causing a conflict of interest with their duty to get the best deal for shareholders of their shell companies.

All IMHO, DYOR etc.

Rgds
dell

dell314
08/10/2006
10:58
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
07/10/2006
19:33
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
07/10/2006
19:09
I'll text him and warn him about a call from you!
double6
07/10/2006
15:11
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
07/10/2006
14:16
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
07/10/2006
12:18
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
07/10/2006
06:21
HABAYYUT. my advice is don't short this.
It will be the most pain you have ever suffered.

william-just
06/10/2006
20:28
lol i dont wear shirts. i wear blouses LOL

ROFLMAO

habayyut
06/10/2006
20:27
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
06/10/2006
20:26
tak

how many names are you gonna have

suehelen
smiler
optimist
sohail
takdeer

what next??

why do u change your handles every week?

habayyut
06/10/2006
20:25
lol no thanks mate

im happy with my shorts in the markets.

habayyut
06/10/2006
20:25
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
06/10/2006
20:25
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
06/10/2006
20:23
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
06/10/2006
20:09
Takdeer

two words

DMR - LOL!!!!

habayyut
06/10/2006
20:05
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
06/10/2006
19:54
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
06/10/2006
06:59
Takdeer/Sadika/SmilerXX(and any other new aliases you are using) - Did you research ACV's directors like I suggested?

I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RMR/EAM RTO.
Here's my post again just to remind you:

Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again.

FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW).

Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly.

Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors?

Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO.

RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)?
Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board?

So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p.

4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps!

Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you?


All IMHO, DYOR etc.

Rgds
dell

dell314
05/10/2006
20:06
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
05/10/2006
19:14
yo double6,

Get your money in LNG there as safe as houses now, because of all the large buys and there will be no bad news from the company, now it has all been cleared up by the looks of it. I am tempted for a big punt @5.75p tomorrow.

Also take a look at WGP which I am also tempted for a punt.

lord santafe
Chat Pages: 67  66  65  64  63  62  61  60  59  58  57  56  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock