Advance Visual Communications Share Discussion Threads

[double6] 05/10/2006 20:10

(1.50p being the BUYING price smiler, yes ?)

[double6] 05/10/2006 20:09

Erm, don't I recognise that name ?!?

[Abuse team] 05/10/2006 19:59

Post removed by ADVFN

[double6] 04/10/2006 20:38

Takdeer .. going, going ......

[double6] 04/10/2006 20:37

Takdeer / smiler28 / smiler 30..... AZH upto 1.5p ??

Best price on the bid (yesterday) was 1.2p (no trades at that price) - current share price 1.0 / 1.1p.

1.5p ?? Talking garbage (as normal ??)

[takdeer] 04/10/2006 19:22

Moving averages turning on the upside...50 day MA, 200 day MA.

[takdeer] 04/10/2006 18:37

Buying trend continues...the price has hold onto the gains and the next leg up should commence soon.

filtered dell314 was deramping AZH a couple of wks ago...RTO happened...rise to 1.50 pence so far...DYOR.

Plenty of other stocks out there where dell maniac has not worked...doomed mongerer.

[dell314] 04/10/2006 08:07

Sadika/SmilerXX - Did you research ACV's directors like I suggested?

I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RMR/EAM RTO.
Here's my post again just to remind you:

Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again.

FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW).

Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly.

Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors?

Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO.

RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)?
Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board?

So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p.

4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps!

Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you?


All IMHO, DYOR etc.

Rgds
dell

[double6] 03/10/2006 20:31

SMILER ALERT - WELL AT LEAST YOU'VE HAD THE SENSE TO DROP THE "SMILER" FROM YOUR NAME NOW!

[sadika] 03/10/2006 19:22

Investtech Analysis Update from yesterday...confirms breakout.





Neutral (Medium term) - Oct 2, 2006 Analysis Explanation
Has broken the ceiling of the falling trend, which indicates a slower initial falling rate. Has given positive signal from a inverse head and shoulders formation by a break up through the resistance at 0.09. Further rise to 0.27 or more is signaled. The stock has support at p 0.12. Poor liquidity (traded 64% of the days, mean 0.07 mill per day) weakens the analysis. The stock is overall assessed as technically neutral for the medium long term.

[sadika] 03/10/2006 19:21

Nice volume again today and a buy came through for 500,000 shares at 0.17 pence which is a premium to the closing offer price of 0.15 pence.

Consolidation today but the above suggests the next leg up shouldn't be too far away.

[sadika] 03/10/2006 19:20

Seems my stalkers are following me around again......keep stalking pests.

[dell314] 03/10/2006 08:59

Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again.

FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW).

Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly.

Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors?

Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO.

RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)?
Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board?

So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p.

4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps!

Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you?

All IMHO, DYOR etc.

Rgds
dell

[william-just] 02/10/2006 21:05

callin it a day se ya tomorrow

[Abuse team] 02/10/2006 20:57

Post removed by ADVFN

[Abuse team] 02/10/2006 20:54

Post removed by ADVFN

[william-just] 02/10/2006 20:51

i have tried loads of times to track down Netcentric directors email or phone numbers but get the same smart assed answers from peeps on that board.
but in answer to your question no sorry

[Abuse team] 02/10/2006 20:48

Post removed by ADVFN

[Abuse team] 02/10/2006 20:44

Post removed by ADVFN

[william-just] 02/10/2006 20:42

whot date is the agm set for please

[william-just] 02/10/2006 20:42

whot date is the agm set for please