||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
|Software & Computer Services
Accesso Tech Share Discussion Threads
Showing 1801 to 1822 of 1825 messages
|Sounds like GODOY instead.|
|And ....... ?|
|so it wasn't up, its down 5p|
|Lol! Good 'ole SETS!spud|
|ACSO up 20p today or is it?|
|I agree it doesn't matter how it's traded its a case of us and them ! In the case of US we have to find a good stock and stick with it.
Games can be played but the GOOD STOCK will always win through.|
|Mike have you got the wrong thread - this is theme park ticketing and queueing not gambling ?|
|Surprised this is just sitting here tbh|
|MrContrarian @MrContrarian 11m11 minutes ago
Even the LSE has its site crowded with spreadbet ads
90% of SB clients lose money, some of which is paid to LSE to bring in more mug punters|
|If this falls it will be bought back up very very quickly! I know quite a few people just patiently waiting for any opportunity to buy on the dips. With TBs track record of delivery I don't think we will ever get any massive falls, unless of course the world is just about to end :-)|
|relatively transparent order book
It hides the deals and allows thousands of stupid little deals to go through. when this falls it will be massive like gbg yesterday|
|I'm not sure he's got much choice - it's the exchange that decides, not the company. And anyway, it's SETSsq, so still has market makers from the SEAQ system.
Let's face it spud - you don't like it because you think it makes it harder for you to trade in and out. Better get used to it, because it's likely to go full SETS before it goes back to SEAQ.|
|so why would he sanction it again?|
|Never liked the system. Last time ACSO was on it, Tom pulled the plug. Wide spreads & exaggerated movements in thin markets. Sh1te imo. spud|
|It also gets it out of the hands of market makers, about whom people complain incessantly, and onto a relatively transparent order book. No system is going to satisfy everyone.|
|Stuff put on sets entirely to encourage trading. Makes it a market for spreadbetting firms then. Also hides institutional trading, distorts price movements, makes level 2 inconsequential.|
|Well if that's the case, I'm not sure I understand what you see the problem as being.|
|Yes I know. I meant investment, as in buying into a stock.
|spud - some of us think that discouraging trading is a very good idea ;¬)|
|Here you go - good luck !
|Can someone explain to me what SETS is?|
|Question : How do you discourage trading in an illiquid stock?
Answer : Move to SETS.