ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

GLIF Gli Finance Limited

2.62
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 00:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Gli Finance Limited LSE:GLIF London Ordinary Share GB00B0CL3P62 ORD NPV
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 2.62 0.00 00:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
2.60 3.00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
  -
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
- O 0 2.62 GBX

Gli Finance (GLIF) Latest News

Real-Time news about Gli Finance Limited (London Stock Exchange): 0 recent articles

Gli Finance (GLIF) Discussions and Chat

Gli Finance Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
13/5/202113:05GLI Finance - SME Finance leading player731
19/10/201508:28Greenwich Loan Income Fund1,924
01/6/201506:15Greenwich Loan2

Add a New Thread

Gli Finance (GLIF) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type

Gli Finance (GLIF) Top Chat Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 26/11/2020 08:16 by future financier
All that I can add to the above is that I see that Honeycomb is managed by Pollen Street - and Pollen Street are very astute - but also very hard - so GLI will be paying a handsome price for their support.
Posted at 19/11/2020 15:50 by makinbuks
GLIF needs a lot of cleaning up until its basically Sancus which is in my view an attractive business capable of being grown and making a nice niche position. I don't own them so participating or not is not relevant but I'd be tempted to ignore it, and invest again once the clean up is complete. If I had a lot at stake I'd be concerned about dilution of course
Posted at 15/6/2020 14:34 by yieldsearch
distressed level pricing on GLIZ, implying either it will go pop or they will re/re/restructure it again.
If GLIZ is trading at distress level, clearly glif shareshould be down to zero

Owned glif long time ago when it was just the equity piece of a clo. The "strategic" investment in multitude of platform basically destroyed shareholder value. Sancus involvement probably delayed the inevitable.
Posted at 18/11/2019 08:40 by peterbill
Further to the Company's announcement of 21 October 2019 regarding the Proposals for the continuation of the ZDP Shares, the Company announces that all resolutions proposed at the class meeting of Ordinary Shareholders, the class meeting of ZDP Shareholders and the extraordinary general meeting held earlier today were duly passed.

The extension of the life of the ZDP Shares from 5 December 2019 to 5 December 2020 takes immediate effect. The increased rate of return on the ZDP Shares, from 5.5% to 8% on the issue price of the ZDP Shares, will take effect from 6 December 2019 in accordance with the New Articles. The final capital entitlement to which ZDP Shareholders will be entitled at the extended repayment date is therefore increased from 130.696 pence per ZDP Share to 141.152 pence per ZDP Share.

Capitalised terms used and not defined in this announcement have the meanings given in the Company's announcement of 21 October 2019.
Posted at 04/8/2019 06:00 by peanut100
Target price 0phttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tech-pioneer-gli-finance-tries-to-ditch-p2p-lending-0768wt6jp
Posted at 10/2/2019 13:37 by cerrito
fred187
ref your comment that they are bonus payments.
I have to say I found both the transactions and the RNS wording rather odd and I have just checked the LSE website and they say Friday share trading in GLIF was 764k ie less than the amount of shares referenced in the RNS.
That said as a matter of interest why do you think they were part of the bonus payment?
Posted at 08/2/2019 19:59 by james188
I highly doubt that the director purchases were a share price support operation. There are very few PIs left and most of the stock is with instis and family offices - most conspicuously Somerston. It is a special situation that could go either way. The judgement call is how much ongoing financial support to provide for the FTV division from the Sancus BMS division - i.e. is it good money after bad or is there any value at all left in FTV?
Posted at 08/2/2019 18:30 by cerrito
yes of course good that the three bought such large amounts but one wonders at their business judgement that they paid such a high price and did not foresee the price would fall so much. Indeed one wonders without them spending £225k between them what the price would have ended up at.
Given market conditions their comments on their fintech investments should come as no surprise but their £1.1m bad loan was rather a surprise.
Good to see such strong revenue growth and too bad no comment on profits, in light of their plans to become profitable by year end.
A good case could be made for buying more at this price; I myself do not see myself buying more as I have very little feel for who they are. True they publish good financial report but for me they have not followed through on their 2018 aspiration to improve stakeholder communications. Actually, their shareholder register is not bad and includes Investec, Axa and Artemis.
Well done to those who sold first thing.
Posted at 31/5/2017 23:23 by kenny
The Sancus BMS businesses produced a return on gross assets of 2.12% (page 24 of the annual report) - so that is hardly anything to write home about - and it is unclear if that was before or after an expense ratio stated as being 48.5% (presumably 48.5% of gross income from loans).

You cite "decent increases" in the size of co-lender loan books. The operating profits for Sancus BMS increased from £2.6m to £3.537m in 2016 (page 25). Those profits are small figures in the context of the overall group and it's market capitalisation. Therefore, they are very unlikely to be the saviour of the group. They would have to increase revenue "over 25%" for quite a few years just to achieve break even as a group.

Markets being what they are, the company may not have the luxury to keep trading at a loss indefinitely on the promise that one day it will become profitable and/or one of their investee companies will hit the jackpot. Besides which, if the big banks are finding it hard to make money at current interest rate margins, what chance GLIF? Unlike GLIF, the big banks do not have expensive loans they have to service; they mainly rely on customer deposits which they pay very little interest upon.

Since I started having a close look at GLIF, having not been a holder here for about 3 years, I have come to the conclusion that I would not invest unless the share price was at or about 5p. Above 5p per share, it is just a big gamble that someone who has more money than sense comes alone with a bid at, say, 10p per share. I would need that large of a margin of safety because there would still be a fair probability of a total wipeout.

I know the above valuations may seem absurdly low to someone who looks at the share price graph. However, what I have found out is that the destruction of capital has been more or less total - even to the extent that I am not at all certain that there is anything to invest in here - at any price! I am quite shocked that a company that previously had a great business investing in CLO loans has destroyed more or less all value by selling that portfolio and gambling the whole lot in P2P start-ups. The previous management also issued shares and loan capital to raise yet more money to invest in P2P start-ups!

Turning the valuation question on it's head - what is a company that is likely to be loss making for many year's to come and with dubious assets worth? I believe it is only worth hope value because unless there is a take over or windup, a shareholder receives nothing for the foreseeable future. Further, "foreseeable future" may become infinite if the company keeps going just to pay the directors salaries while gradually consuming its assets in annual operating losses and asset write downs.

The above is not intended as investment advice - no doubt the share price will have many bounces over the next few months and years, but I think with both a) the balance sheet not yet reflecting a true write down in the value of assets/investments and, b) operating losses (never mind investment losses) continuing for the foreseeable future (or at least until base rate exceeds 5%, which may not be in our lifetime), the overall long term trajectory in the share price will be down.

As always, I think the question is - what are you getting if you invest here? I certainly cannot find anything that is either sustainable or of substance compared to the current market capitalisation but I remain open to being convinced otherwise?
Posted at 25/5/2017 15:23 by garycook
John Whittle Non-Ex Director buys 27,750 shares at 17.38.Nice to see,if only a small amount, a director buying at hopefully the bottom for the GLIF share price It just needs the rest of the Director,s to put their hand in their pockets and buy,to show condfident in the company.
Gli Finance share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock