We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7digital Group Plc | LSE:7DIG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BMH46555 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.69 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/10/2016 18:24 | GENISES - Thanks but this was flagged by 7Digital on their website in August:- | michaelmouse | |
01/10/2016 18:14 | MONTREAL, Sept. 22, 2016 /PRNewswire/ - Playster, the world's first all-in-one entertainment streaming service, is proud to announce newly signed partnerships with a number of the world's biggest and best music labels and distribution companies: Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group and The Orchard. In doing so, the Montreal-based platform is adding millions of titles to its catalog, including music from multi-platinum recording stars and many of the industry's brightest indie artists. Playster has also unveiled a completely revamped music section, powered by 7digital, which will take members' streaming experience to new heights with expertly tailored recommendations, curated playlists and unique mood-based sorting. | genises | |
01/10/2016 18:05 | Post 869? GENISES - Can you post a link please? Thanks in advance. | michaelmouse | |
01/10/2016 18:01 | universal next!! | genises | |
01/10/2016 17:37 | well done 7dig | genises | |
28/9/2016 18:52 | Scotneya - "i.e. Musical.ly is big and getting bigger, does 7D piggy back on this growth? Definitive answers would be good, as opposed to speculation." From the half year results:- "Major new customer launches this period including Musical.ly in 30 territories." ............. "Typically, customers pay an initial set-up fee and then a fixed monthly licence fee for using our platform; in addition, we may also take a share of user related revenues generated by the service, including transaction and subscription revenues." ............ "We also signed an agreement with musical.ly, the fast-growing global social media platform based around video and music with a strong and growing global footprint of over 100m users and we expect monthly revenues from this agreement to increase over time." It would suggest that the answer to your question is yes. | michaelmouse | |
28/9/2016 13:59 | Genises A tip - you like me are a non paying subscriber here so ADVFN block your URLS therefore the 3 above can't be immediately accessed This is EASY to get around When you copy and paste the URL SUBSTITUTE the http with hTtp and then it works like magic :-) I have done that for the important radio player news which I can't understand as having not been deemed newsworthy by7digital Cheers S | sweenoid | |
28/9/2016 13:28 | hxxp://www.dailypoli This one is better | genises | |
28/9/2016 13:05 | New partnership hxxp://radiotoday.co | genises | |
28/9/2016 10:42 | Scotneya Best to come from the horses mouth. Phone him up Matt Honey, Chief Financial Officer 020 70997777 7digital Group | genises | |
28/9/2016 10:40 | brilliant they now have a £12.50 price target :-) These automated tip pages are chronic | wh1spa | |
28/9/2016 09:57 | hxxp://www.ftsenews. | genises | |
28/9/2016 09:26 | Question. The contract with musical.ly, does anyone know how it is structured? According to website 7D work with musical.ly to "power the service". Is the revenue stream based on the 1 service we provide, or does it depend on the number of users accessing the service? i.e. Musical.ly is big and getting bigger, does 7D piggy back on this growth? Definitive answers would be good, as opposed to speculation. The answer also provides insight into the forward-thinking of 7D management. Thinking of taking a (small) punt. | scotneya | |
28/9/2016 08:51 | Directors buying since finals Two large digital companies went into admin June and July I reckon they have picked up some of the major contracts that were up for grabs | genises | |
28/9/2016 08:50 | Last week in the finals. The sales pipeline is strong for the second half of the year with a number of significant contracts in the final stages of negotiation". | genises | |
27/9/2016 17:33 | musical.ly is shaping up to be a very interesting customer:- “As new users join musical.ly "More than half of U.S. teens are users of musical.ly. Since first being made available in October 2014, musical.l | michaelmouse | |
26/9/2016 11:22 | "It all seems reasonably clear to me." Did you keep a straight face when you wrote that? ;) It is clear now however. Nice to see Miton and Directors buying. | michaelmouse | |
26/9/2016 11:03 | It all seems reasonably clear to me. Someone wanted to shift a load of shares and invited bids. Ed Kershaw bid 5.52p for 90,532 and got filled. Simon Cole and Matt Honey bid 5.015p for about 200k shares each. As per RNS1 from 22nd Sep. Turns out A.N.Other bid something in the middle for 300k shares so Simon & Matt only got part filled. As per corrected RNS from 22nd Sep. (Which was only part corrected, the total of 489k shares materially wrong). As it happened, Someone had yet more shares to shift and turned out to be willing to completely fill Simon and Matt's order (today's RNS). | rapier686 | |
26/9/2016 10:57 | Isn't the scenario simply that holder A wishes to sell say 1M shares, so broker rings around and see's who would like to buy - if total of that exercise is > 1M then everyone could be scaled back so that the 1M sale is matched... Looking back at trades of recent days, one would guess that the seller was selling 2,289,403 | iainbarclay | |
26/9/2016 10:56 | OK I've had it clarified now. On 22nd September the Directors wanted to buy more stock than they achieved. Due to excessive demand their request was scaled back. They've now managed to pick up additional stock. I assume Miton and other institutions were also unable to pick up all the stock they were after. If this is true then stock is in short supply and the share price should continue its upward trajectory from here. | michaelmouse | |
26/9/2016 10:44 | Apologies but I'm like a dog with a bone here. If they've been "scaled back" then there are only two scenarios:- 1) A placing has already been undertaken, an excess demand meant they couldn't keep their previous scale. or 2) An institution off-loaded their holding to a single (predatory?) shareholder perhaps. Mathematically they can't lose scale unless more shares have been issued, unless they are comparing Directors and institutional shareholding vs. A.N.OTHER. | michaelmouse |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions