We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beacon Hill | LSE:BHR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WM8G33 | ORD 0.01P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.025 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 0.025 | GBX |
Beacon Hill (BHR) Share Charts1 Year Beacon Hill Chart |
|
1 Month Beacon Hill Chart |
Intraday Beacon Hill Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20/11/2017 | 22:36 | Beacon Hill Resources - coal production in Mozambique. | 10,261 |
| 10/12/2014 | 12:25 | Beacon Hill Resources (BHR) 2011 & Beyond | 3,519 |
| 09/12/2014 | 13:58 | Beacon Hill Resources | 3,321 |
| 09/9/2014 | 17:35 | Bear Trap Rebound requires 50 day moving average break | - |
| 13/9/2011 | 22:21 | Beacon Hill Resources - progressing coal producer in Mozambique | - |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 07/4/2016 07:25 by noveltychiang what happened to this share now? |
Posted at 26/1/2016 19:02 by oliversanvil Why were we not told? Any reference? On BHR BBs |
Posted at 24/1/2016 10:29 by oliversanvil Who engaged Baker Tilley in the first place? The BHR BODS perhaps in cahoots ! |
Posted at 23/11/2015 19:14 by osammyboy2 It really is time to believe Oliver. The whole thing stinks . 11 Dec 2014 a new investor Daniel Lark buys 12.24% of the company. 12Jan 15 into Aministration.13 Feb 15 shares cancelled and BHR delisted. In light of that why do you think we're likely to see anything? Might be an idea to enquire of the administrators as to progress in finding new owners |
Posted at 18/8/2015 18:35 by oliversanvil Read again ---BHR own the rail allocation for another 4 years not the sub -sub leasees that have covertly hired BHR shareholders trainset. Thus the Mozambique Government awarded BHR the rail allocation. NOT WHO HAS THE TRAINSET NOW! (NON TRANSFERABLE).or should it be non trainsferable! |
Posted at 17/8/2015 16:03 by oliversanvil "How many times do you have to be told" that BHR own the rail allocation for another 4 years not the sub -sub leasees that have covertly hired BHR shareholders trainset. Thus the Mozambique Government awarded BHR the rail allocation. NOT WHO HAS THE TRAINSET NOW! (NON TRANSFERABLE).or should it be non trainsferable! |
Posted at 27/2/2015 01:07 by katie1234 Below is a post from the LSE BHGU Board, that BHR shareholders have started using to keep in contact. All shareholders who have verified their holdings with BHRSAC should now have received an invite to the meeting. If you wish to attend the meeting or receive updates from BHRSAC, but have not yet verified your holdings, please send confirmation to bhrshareholders@outlAndytheMKDon Shareholder Meeting We are now at a juncture where we need to have a shareholder meeting to get wider shareholder involvement and to consider how we fund our initiatives going forwards. We have had substantive meetings over recent weeks, with all parties, and will be able to put forward our true position as shareholders at the meeting. An e-mail will be sent out soon asking for confirmation of attendance and publishing the date and time. I will not publish it here for obvious reasons. It's now time for all disgruntled, dispossessed and disenfranchised shareholders to step forward to help carry the fight forward. We truly hope there will be strong support for the meeting. regards. Andy. ;+) |
Posted at 31/1/2015 10:51 by redbike_lse Libra,20,000,000,000 Existing Ordinary Shares and up to 6,666,667,000 Warrants at a price equivalent to 0.0075 pence per Existing Ordinary Share. Post consolidation get dropped with that lot as a dilution, how could shareholders make money not just the one or two shorters. while everyone had a 1000/1 adjustment, this lot gets dropped on shareholders. Only two winners as far as I can see with this, people taking it up and people using the cash for salaries out of it, literally money for old rope as we produce nothing, sell nothing and appear to do nothing either. If passed all resolutions shareholders would be sunk, and certainly no power in any future vote when they would lower the share price again, place at what they want to who they want, they have looked after shareholders so far haven't they. "Further dilution would clearly reduce that, if allowed, later." If allowed went by the wayside on a lowered share price which enabled them to get as far as they have, so they could issue placings like this one proposed which dilutes shareholders out, and Darwin get to offload and we are in the spiral again. You agree that this is a good thing, the same as the BOD at BHR that shareholders are getting a great deal, I have yet to see one explanation on any bulletin board that shows value for shareholders based on what was proposed. Great company if you had the nous to short this stock for twelve months, sadly many people invested in the potential for a return on what it spoke of in RNS's. No one has answered where the March cash call was coming from yet either or when the date for the placing would be and have had a long time to look at it. That could have been where shareholders get their turn to put in again after their consolidation and dilution with a bit more jam tomorrow to swing it for them just enough to tease their hard earned money to try and recoup some of the losses and what will be coming for their cash, talks in progress, potential investor talks ongoing..yawn..yawn. Shareholders deserve a little better than that or at least that's the belief of many. Instead of getting hammered time after time and then offered another battering while the pigs are at the trough ensuring that they are full and remain full and continue to plan to remain full at PI's expense. The recent behavior by the BOD at BHR shows that perhaps people were right to say no and enough is enough, all just general thoughts that have some weight in merit based on what we know from historics in BHR and also recent events. I do welcome any good explanation as to why it would have been all so different and so much better for shareholders had the resolutions been passed if your willing to share it? |
Posted at 21/12/2014 12:50 by redbike_lse Last audited accounts put BHR at $60m in asset value, so even in administrationShareholders should receive a decent portion back, unless the asset values are also fraudulent and in which case the Auditors and BHR can have an action taken against them, so "IF" we do go to admin will know the full extent of any dodgy goings on, so is in the interest of BHR to sort something out that isn't administration and gives shareholders a better deal or the Audits start. Trains we don't own them , they are on a lease, which then are subleased out to "Mystery" person, at a cost of .......BHR wont tell anyone, which is strange. Now this person will know that if we go to administration they loose that sublease too, considering the time taken and losing a considerable chunk of transport may make them think too on if its worth taking a punt for the company. Doesn't take the brains of BHR BOD to know its someone local to BHR. June 2015 larger slice of allocation for BHR is up for grabs so they wouldn't want that to go by the wayside either. This company is worth much more than the board are letting on, the vote was so shareholders get diluted and then have no say, but really...... Given that asset values have been declared more or less, leaves us with two factors, either Option A: We have more value than is being let on, hence the effort to try to remove shareholders at any cost, even if it means trying to rig a EGM vote. Option B: The accounts are dodgy and have no value, in which case the Auditors and BHR can be taken to court, as the BOD signed off on them. Nailed and picking up liquid soap in pokey. For shareholders its a no brainer, so Mr Karstel and Jones if you do read boards The information is already out there via RNS, so yes it could be like the last hours of Enron but doubt that, just means you have to do whats right for shareholders as they really do have you by the short and curlies, shorter than Toni & Guy can cut and curlier than a demi wave perm they can do. Chop Chop as they say.....hair today and gone tomorrow...i doubt that ;-) |
Posted at 04/12/2014 19:00 by katie1234 Post courtesy of Tiff LSEHow scary is it that there are people on here who still do not understand the implications of a YES vote. Lets ignore the consolidation for now. If the resolutions get passed the current 4 Billion shares increases by 75Billion to Jindal and Latitude at 0.01p per share to cover the existing loan notes (no new money!) and another 20 Billion (plus Warrants totalling 6.67 billion) at 0.0075p per share for a cash injection of £1.5M. That cash, we know from previous rinsings, keeps head above water until March 15. Then they will need some more cash because the mine will not start producing until mid 2016 (if you believe that because it was supposed to be up and running in 2013!). Meanwhile no guarantee that DFI will provide capital funding to get to Tier 1 production and no assurance from Jindal that they defer their loan repayment of $4.1M due 30 Jan to after 31 Mar! Without DFI money how are BHR going to settle that? Back to the point... there are currently 4Billion shares, if yes vote there will be 100Billion! So if you believe that BHR has a net asset value currently say of £50M, that works out at possibly 1.2p per share. After 17 Dec and a yes vote that will be ....wait for it....0.05p per share...a reduction of a factor of 24 (2400%!). And then comes the dilution.....if they do not dilute the share price cannot drop below 0.01 because that is the face value of each share ...so dilute 1:1000 and on day one your shares have the same value as they did pre-dilution (assuming a stable SP!). but the face value of the share is and therefore the share price now has the room to drop from it's new price of 0.01 x1000 = 10p all the way down to 0.01p! Fantastic isn't it. Now no-one can predict what you may get back if anything were there a takeover/liquidation now but there is far more potential for PIs to recover something than there ever will be after 17 Dec. VOTE NO, NO, NO and NO |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
