We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheffield Utd | LSE:SUT | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002181484 | ORD 10P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 6.50 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 6.50 | GBX |
Sheffield United (SUT) Share Charts1 Year Sheffield United Chart |
|
1 Month Sheffield United Chart |
Intraday Sheffield United Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2014 | 13:29 | Sheffield United....Blade Runner? | 2,942 |
| 03/6/2007 | 10:19 | Massive price rise - Is this an error? | 6 |
| 23/5/2007 | 03:39 | SUT With Charts & News | 4 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 01/12/2014 13:29 by sharw Received letter today saying report available.What a disaster - another big loss of £3.4m leaving shareholders funds of 0.05p/share. lmmx.co.uk/companies |
Posted at 12/3/2013 13:41 by johnstonp London Matched Markets (formally JP Jenkins) gives last price at 7.5p |
Posted at 12/3/2013 13:31 by uknighted I think it's a scam. I had the same approach about some ETQ shares I held 2 or 3 years ago. I expect to get a request to forward money to cover some legal or bank charges necessary to release the proceeds!! Shame, it would be nice to be getting in excess of £4 per share :-) Anyone know what they are currently worth? Regards UK |
Posted at 04/12/2010 14:35 by sharw From the JPJ site:Shareholders in Sheffield United should be aware that an overseas company is making unsolicited calls to shareholders offering them a vastly inflated price for their shares. Shareholders should ignor all correspondance and not enter into any business with them as this is a financial scam. Please read below regarding reporting such issues to the FSA The rest is at: |
Posted at 24/3/2010 10:59 by johnstonp SUT shares are tradeable with J P Jenkins |
Posted at 12/1/2010 22:01 by johnstonp into next round of FA Cup qpr 2 - sut 3great stuff. not sure if my shares are worth anything tho Manu not in it |
Posted at 20/5/2009 08:21 by outsourcer Thanks for the info Chatterjee, I to am holding until after Monday, although I do worry that there is nothing stopping the directors dropping the price considerably in order to pick up the remaining shares cheap to try to gain full control of the club.If we do get back in the premiership the potential £60M windfall from that, the £20M (roughly) Tevez compensation and increased ticket/merchandise sales surely make the current share price of 8.5p look very undervalued. I just feel that unless it is planned to sell the club their is little incentive for the directors to reflect the true value of the company. But then I might just be a cynical northerner ! |
Posted at 31/12/2008 17:01 by jasper28 If the shares are set at 8.5p for the first quarter, will the share price be decided upon by the directors each other quarter.So in my understanding, we are able to keep our shares but the share price value will be ajusted by the directors. If an investor comes in and want 100% of the club an oportunity for a decent price could be offered? Could anyone clarify? |
Posted at 09/12/2008 17:56 by chatterjee1932 Smaller shareholders can't say they weren't warned over the directors' decision to take the club out of "public ownership." As we knew all along, McCabe (KM) and his sons owned the club only because no other significant party had the financial clout or motivation to challenge his position. Without question, KM has been good for the club. He helped achieve the club to promotion to the Premiership and has tried to maintain a lid on spending that the plc couldn't afford. However, if the club is back in private hands and in their ownership, he and his sons will have no excuse to put much more of their own cash to fund players' wages. I am not fully aware of the extent that the economic downturn has affected Caledonia holdings and the Scarborough group- companies that they own related to global property. I understand McCabe sold much of his interest to an Australian goup called Valad. Maybe he is ready to emulate Dave Whelan, Gibson, Al-Fayed etc and spend his fortunes to make Sheffield United Premiership regular force.From hereon, being seen to be doing the right thing on behalf of the fans won't be enough. They will have to spend their own money accordingly to fund fans' ambitions and expectations. I would assume that all the supplementary businesses that they attempted to set up will be more a burden than a bonus to the future club's finances. Maybe the gyms might make them a few thousand but questions remain over the other property businesses. Smaller shareholders are bound to feel sour about their investments and it is important that they show an element of solidarity on December 27th. They have invested their own relatively small amounts in faith that the club will bounce back to the Premiership and that a selling opportunity may arise should West Ham have to pay btween 25 million and 50 million. The plc is currently is officially worth 11.14 million pounds and no doubt the value has been driven down by this week's news. The share price mysteriously reduced by 2 pence before the day of the announcement due to the Reading win and on the back of a decent point at Ipswich....not forgetting the VAT cuts. Promising manager Kevin Blackwell signs a new contract and all appears well- except for the share price. If the price of 8.5 pence per share is significant, then directors will have to pay out at least £541,227.13 total to smaller shareholders to relieve the annual costs burden of being registered to AIM. More importantly, the money lost by small shareholders and families- made to fell bitter by their losses- will in the long term hurt the club more. As a fan and investor myself, I haven't been altogether happy with the club's actions- delays in removing Bryan Robson, the Iain Hume affair. The recent way that the club coaches spoke on the matter sounded not only heartless but without any spirit of fairplay and goodwill. Defending Chris Morgan's actions however isn't for this board. Although, it was Emile Heskey and not Carlos Tevez who bullied Morgan himself into submission and relegated United on the last day of 2007 season. McCabe and the private club may receive a few million for the "unfair" relegation but in the long term, he has a lot more to do if his aim is to be remembered who brought long, stable success to Sheffield United, playing regularly amongst the nation's elite- something he hasn't quite yet managed to do.... |
Posted at 29/4/2007 11:40 by johne1 By contrast: -SUT share price at 18.25p Shares in issue = 278,508,014 (Ord 10p) Market cap = £50.828 million? Not sure how the fundies compare!!! |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
