|
Posted |
Poster |
Post |
|---|
| 18 May 2013 | pitoma vretica | Out of interest why does rns refer to Australian law for a UK company. There appears to have been a new and different pay scheme which should require validation rather than what seems at first glance to be new and possibly outside remit of remuneration committee who work with existing rules\schemes rather than new ones.
Wasnt Tom previously paid by arrangement with Apnea used as vehicle which... read more... |
| 16 May 2013 | 555jimmy | AGM resolution 1/1 - sell company to highest bidder - tick box yes or no
does anyone have a better suggestion to recoup our investment?
In 2008 it was wait for kennedy results and we will be rich beyond our wildest dreams
In 2009 it was wait for kowalik results and we will be rich beyond our wildest dreams
In 2010 it was wait for riverbend results and we will be rich beyond our wildest... read more... |
| 18 May 2013 | adenholm | Just hope that all shareholders concerned about the management options issue request a proxy vote if not attending the upcoming AGM.
It will now be a straight vote on the issue of management options, no smoke and mirrors about bank funding option requirements.
Will also be interesting to see who is up for re-election.
read more... |
| 17 May 2013 | pitoma vretica | But enough to spend more on BoD by look of it. If they were as good at raising sharehder value as they are at looking after themselves family and friends we would not be languishing at these levels. Incentives are one thing but eme gives impression its feck or screw shareholders to do it
Time for trough to be shared with shareholders read more... |
| Tue 12:07 | the guardian | Can we just put this notion of suspension out of the way,
Gold Oil was suspended last year because we voted off the whole board bar the CEO. We also had no cash and large debts, due to the actions of those that we had removed.
The company was allowed out of suspension with only two board members, as this was seen sufficient by both the NOMAD and the LSE.
An EGM to remove TK and replace him... read more... |
| Tue 10:32 | trotting12 | Showe,,it looks like your comeing round to my way of thinking,,,why did it take so long!!,,,,there's only one way forward and it's time we grasped the nettle, read more... |
| Tue 09:08 | sh0wme | This is a simple business model.
Option 1.
An experienced CEO is all we need. The day to day running is simple. The accounting function will be straight forward that any decent financial administrator could run. A part time FD/proactive accountancy firm could over see. A geologist used on a consultancy basis as and when required. Finally a chairman that has the shareholder interests.
Not... read more... |
| Mon 19:16 | trotting12 | Fitzy,,judging by the increase in pay and the mystery pension contributions and the Huge rise in expenses it looks like toms planning business as usual,,,and if you don't vote for change expect a jolly good rodgering on a regular basis,
read more... |
| Mon 07:43 | pitoma vretica | I'm with cross-eyed.
Seems to be me the campaign on Tom is accompanied by a campaign by others in trying to condition expectations.
Crosseyed has probably put more work than most if not anyone on this bb and at the risk of sounding rampy with the right sentiment and management aligned with the purpose of adding shareholder value rather than the perception of 'skimming' there is no reason why... read more... |
| Sun 23:38 | mavverick | To have a better chance of attracting instys/other investors the BoD would surely need to get rid of the 7.5% annual farce/policy to reasonable range of 0.5% to 1.0% and be willing to answer any reasonable insty questions for basic details on who these 19,000,000 TKApnea third parties were/are. Releasing results into this backdrop and the 9m at 6p ?imminent was also not smart.
Given the Code... read more... |
23/05/2013 04:13:26
