|17 Apr 2014||trotting12||Why would maq bank sell their stake to an inst for any less than what we all want for our shares,,it's quite clear ,Tom sells eme or we look for a new CEO , read more...|
|18 Apr 2014||sh0wme||IMO once the reserves are known via the report which is due soon (next week Toon posted via Cenkos info), TK needs to engage with a specialist in corporate gas and oil transactions who can approach suitable potential investors with the vue to maximise the sale price. Yes, I'm sure they will approach companies with interests in the s/l but there are plenty of other companies that would... read more...|
|Mon 08:00||judijudi||I cannot believe that seemingly intelligent holders think that the current bod will create wealth by organic growth for them
Have they not been witness to years and years of greed, murkiness and share price decimation?
You lot are living in cloud cuckoo land if you think this bod is the right one to bring you that!
Change the management if organic growth is what you want, or sell the lot now... read more...|
|17 Apr 2014||chillidog2||First Macquarie had heard of it when broker made enquiries. Sounds like a Ned invention. Ned be better off spending time trying to sell the company for top dollar to benefit Macquarie and shareholders much more than Ned's time spent trying to arrange a presentation using the excuse he wants Macquarie to sell its shares to anyone. Like larger holders they would gain more from a sale. Why would... read more...|
|17 Apr 2014||trotting12||Toon/laz,,the last chance saloon closed long ago ,in regard to giving Tom another chance ,,let's get it sold and move on , read more...|
|15 hours ago||judijudi||The issue is not when the RR will arrive but what it will say.
The issue is not when the RR will arrive but what TK does after it's realease
|yesterday 07:41||chillidog2||Slippery Nick change his post. You posted originally that Ned's holding was offshore and engaged on that basis. The set of posts was all about Ned's holding not whether there were any holdings by others offshore.
Cross didn't confirm Ned's holding was offshore
The only offshore noted was Asymmetric.
You saying Ned is the owner of the shares in Asymmetric. If not changing your posts is a bit... read more...|
|Sat 19:47||johnsmithmmxiii||Chill dog...no need to be rude just because you don't understand English and can't follow the argument. Who said Macquarie want to sell? Wind your neck in a bit and think before you post!! I certainly never said they WANT to sell, so why do you keep harping on about 'no evidence Macquarie want to sell'? Try understanding the following...
1. TK might be up for 're-election
2. TK probably does... read more...|
|18 Apr 2014||enamel||Existing shareholders want to sell the company because they consider that the BOD are ineffective. I have thought this for many years, so yes I would like to see the company sold at a fair value price, say 25p to 30p. However, the fact is no one has yet bid at a realistic price even though the price has been ridiculously low.
Posters hopefully suggest that once a for sale notice goes up... read more...|
|18 Apr 2014||elbillo||I think there may well be a lot of upset shareholders over the coming months for what it's worth I don't believe that the RR will have a significant impact on the SP though hopefully the year end results will. My money is on there not being a sale of the company and we will still be here in 12 months time, as long as the SP increases I have no problem with that. read more...|